That's my point exactly: If you register a Maltese company, you pay 5% tax (minimum) on all income of the company (except for strictly defined "foreign income"), plus you have to pay for accounting etc.
But if you set up a US LLC and register it as opaque (your choice even!), then you don't need accounting and you pay 0% tax? So Malta basically let's you choose "Hey, do you︀ want to pay tax on this company, or would you want it to be a︁ hybrid mismatch, so you don't pay tax? Ok cool."
It just sounds too good to︂ be true for me, and I also don't see how this would be in Malta's︃ interest.
Even if Malta treats the US LLC as opaque, if you're the only person︄ behind the company and you live in Malta, they should say there is a PE︅ in Malta, and then they should tax the PE like a branch (35% with refund).︆ This is what would make sense, and this is also what a Maltese lawyer told︇ me. He also said it could be different if the company has income from an︈ asset outside of Malta, like royalty income etc. - then such income may indeed not︉ be taxed in Malta - but it would be the same with a Maltese company.︊
Anyway, I trust that
@A1988 has done his research, and a lot of people seem︋ to be running such setups, so it seems like this does indeed work in practice.︌
Even though it reminds me of Cyprus residents with their HK and Seychelles offshore companies,︍ living off "dividends"... Since apparently Cyprus doesn't enforce PE rules either.
Then again, I have︎ heard that there are like 3 tax inspectors for the whole country, so I'm not️ quite sure if this is intended by Cyprus or if they just lack the resources to enforce the law. Or maybe the lack of resources is intentional...
Fair point, but I would guess, if you really want to do it by the book, you would have to register a Maltese branch of the US LLC, and then you would have︀ to make this information public, just like for a Maltese company.