Best management location for US LLC

Status
Not open for further replies.
bubbledouble said:
I've tried reading through the thread to figure out what the actual solution to your question is. You live in Dubai, have a US LLC, and therefore pay the lowest possible tax namely, only income tax, which is 0% in Dubai as it stands now.

Isn't that the solution?
Click to expand...
Yes. But what about me? I do not live in Dubai and have active income. That's why we are still discussing. Some people care more about me than others 😉

Also, I guess most people do not like to live in Dubai for more than 4 months of the year.
 
Marzio said:
It works for him because he said he has an IP holding and investing company so it's 100% passive income.
Click to expand...

The lawyer said it has to be linked to an asset outside of Malta. So even if it's passive income, I would expect that it somehow has to be located outside of Malta. Not sure how you would do this.
Maybe you have a SaaS and it's hosted outside of Malta and you sell the license to use the software. I guess something like that can work.
But if you provide services (or resell services provided by people outside of Malta), the income would be considered as arising in Malta.
 
daniels27 said:
Yes. But what about me? I do not live in Dubai and have active income. That's why we are still discussing. Some people care more about me than others 😉
Click to expand...

As mentioned before, the UAE would likely subject the US LLC income as UAE-sourced and subject to corporate income tax.
Even influencers (acting under their own name) have to pay corporate income tax. So even if it was indeed treated as personal income, this doesn't mean it wouldn't be subject to corporate tax.
And the UAE has made it very clear that entities that are managed from the UAE are subject to corporate tax.
This just isn't enforced at the moment, they are going after the big companies with actual offices etc. first.
But maybe this will change in 10 years and they will then demand that you pay up for the previous 10 years. Or maybe nothing will happen, who knows.
But it's a big risk, and if SHTF, they can place you under a travel ban or put you in jail. This isn't Thailand. Everything is still new, there is no case law for this.

However, the risk would be drastically lowered if you could point to a manager in another country - which is what I was asking about originally.

daniels27 said:
Also, I guess most people do not like to live in Dubai for more than 4 months of the year.
Click to expand...

That would be plenty enough to be considered tax resident.
 
bubbledouble said:
I've tried reading through the thread to figure out what the actual solution to your question is. You live in Dubai, have a US LLC, and therefore pay the lowest possible tax namely, only income tax, which is 0% in Dubai as it stands now.

Isn't that the solution?
Click to expand...

No, that is not correct, as explained once again above.
Personal income tax is only paid on salaries in the UAE. If you manage an offshore company from Dubai, it becomes subject to UAE corporate tax.
"But how can a person pay corporate tax?"
Don't ask me, those are the rules!

https://kwsme.com/blog/corporate-tax-for-uae-freelancers/
https://www.freelanceinformer.com/news/new-uae-corporate-tax-to-impact-freelancers/
https://gulfnews.com/business/corpo...n-businesses-must-prepare-for-1.1703480392292
 
Probably the best bet is US LLC + Bahrain residency, where they don't have any taxes unlike the UAE, so there's no concept of PE
 
What about Bulgaria and Georgia? Aren't they also not imposing CFC rule for individuals?
 
daniels27 said:
Switzerland neither.

But there are PE rules, maybe not that enforced but there are.
Click to expand...

I really struggle to understand the difference between those two...

When you say "there are PE rules" what consequences do you have in mind if those are triggered? Would it be local CIT applied to offshore entity? If yes then how is that different to CFC ? Or are those consequences something else?

Last edited: Mar 10, 2025
 
JosephLL said:
I really struggle to understand the difference between those two...

When you say "there are PE rules" what consequences do you have in mind if those are triggered? Would it be local CIT applied to offshore entity? If yes then how is that different to CFC ? Or are those consequences something else?
Click to expand...
PE rules apply to permanent establishments. CFC applies on the owners.

If you trigger a PE, your company is being taxes like a local one.
 
JosephLL said:
I really struggle to understand the difference between those two...
Click to expand...

Permanent establishment is about where work is done.

If you register your company in the Bahamas, but you really live in Spain and the company has no other employees than you and you basically do everything from your apartment in Spain, then the company is taxed like a local Spanish company. It would be very easy to prove that the company "is just you" and that you are in Spain, so the company should be taxed in Spain.

But imagine a company that doesn't do much. For example, a company that owns your company logo/trademark. Imagine this company is registered in the Bahamas and you have a desk in a co-working space in the Bahamas and a part-time employee who checks the mail twice per week. You go there 2-3 times per year to have a board meeting. The company otherwise doesn't do much, it just owns the trademark. Now your Spanish company pays 1M per year to the Bahamas company for being allowed to use the logo/trademark.
The logo/trademark company has no PE in Spain - after all, it doesn't do much. What would the activity in Spain be? No works is done, it just passively owns the trademark, that can be done by your part-time employee in the Bahamas.
So it would be very difficult for Spain to tax this company.

This is why CFC rules were introduced: They basically say "Ok, even if no work is done in our country, if the owner of the company is in Spain and the company is in a tax haven, then we still will tax this company like a Spanish company." (a bit simplified, but this is the idea)
Usually there are additional rules like "Only if >50% of the company's income is passive" etc. - they usually wouldn't count it as a CFC if you had a hotel in the Bahamas, for example. CFC rules are mostly about destroying setups like the above where someone wants to use a shell company to hold trademarks etc. and thus shift profits to a tax haven.

If you have an operative business, CFC rules usually don't matter, because they can just check where the work/management is performed, and then tax the company based on that.
 
daniels27 said:
If you trigger a PE, your company is being taxes like a local one.
Click to expand...

There's a minor distinction here:
Most high-tax countries tax the worldwide income of tax-resident companies and they have both PoEM rules (place of effective management) and PE (permanent establishment) rules.
If a company has its effective place of management in their country, the company is considered tax resident and has to pay tax in that country on its worldwide income.
if a company only has a PE in that country (but not its PoEM), it only pays tax on the income that can be linked to the PE.
But for a one-man company, there is no difference, obviously.
 
Marzio said:
If it's not too much of a hassle could you please ask your lawyer:

1. if a LLP could also be used for the resident non domiciled company strategy
2. what are the requirements for the resident non domiciled company to get a tax residency certificate.
Click to expand...
Sorry for the late reply, so I asked my lawyer. My US LLC is treated as tax transparent or disregarded entity in the US and also in Malta but an ELECTION has to be made in malta for the US LLC to be treated as TAX OPAQUE. This election has to be made within 60 days of Incorporation otherwise it's null and void.

Hence, the money remitted to Malta is only taxed and the money not remitted is not taxed as non domiciled company. There is another tax efficient solution to bring the MONEY as a Shareholder LOAN which is considered as capital and hence it's TAXFREE in malta.
 
A1988 said:
Sorry for the late reply, so I asked my lawyer. My US LLC is treated as tax transparent or disregarded entity in the US and also in Malta but an ELECTION has to be made in malta for the US LLC to be treated as TAX OPAQUE. This election has to be made within 60 days of Incorporation otherwise it's null and void.

Hence, the money remitted to Malta is only taxed and the money not remitted is not taxed as non domiciled company. There is another tax efficient solution to bring the MONEY as a Shareholder LOAN which is considered as capital and hence it's TAXFREE in malta.
Click to expand...
Since I am The sole owner and director of my US llc and a resident of Malta with resident ID and maltese drivers license and a home, I will not have any problem getting a tax residency certificate.
 
A1988 said:
This election has to be made within 60 days of Incorporation otherwise it's null and void.
Click to expand...

You move to Malta first, then form a US LLC and elect the newly formed US LLC to be treated as opaque entity in Malta.

Since Malta sourced income is considered when a service is performed inside Malta and the payment is received from either a maltese resident individual or company, you basically are running a tax free company if you don't remit money in Malta.

Best setup in the world hands down.

A1988 said:
There is another tax efficient solution to bring the MONEY as a Shareholder LOAN which is considered as capital and hence it's TAXFREE in malta.
Click to expand...

This is the cherry on top.
 
Marzio said:
You move to Malta first, then form a US LLC and elect the newly formed US LLC to be treated as opaque entity in Malta.

Since Malta sourced income is considered when a service is performed inside Malta and the payment is received from either a maltese resident individual or company, you basically are running a tax free company if you don't remit money in Malta.

Best setup in the world hands down.



This is the cherry on top.
Click to expand...
All thanks to your suggestion 2 years ago, sometimes I do want to live in marbella but I'll just remain at resident of Malta and enjoy spain as a lifestyle holiday place and nothing more. I am hearing people being audited after 1 year in spain on beckham law, i believe it's a solid trap by hacienda.
 
A1988 said:
All thanks to your suggestion 2 years ago, sometimes I do want to live in marbella but I'll just remain at resident of Malta and enjoy spain as a lifestyle holiday place and nothing more. I am hearing people being audited after 1 year in spain on beckham law, i believe it's a solid trap by hacienda.
Click to expand...
Yeah, from the many threads here on OCT and elsewhere, it's clear that relocating to Spain is a huge no-go, at least if you like keeping the money you earn for yourself and not handing it over to the government or the tax authorities.
 
A1988 said:
Sorry for the late reply, so I asked my lawyer. My US LLC is treated as tax transparent or disregarded entity in the US and also in Malta but an ELECTION has to be made in malta for the US LLC to be treated as TAX OPAQUE. This election has to be made within 60 days of Incorporation otherwise it's null and void.

Hence, the money remitted to Malta is only taxed and the money not remitted is not taxed as non domiciled company. There is another tax efficient solution to bring the MONEY as a Shareholder LOAN which is considered as capital and hence it's TAXFREE in malta.
Click to expand...
Does anyone know exactly how to elect US LLC as opaque in Malta? What is the procedure exactly?
 
MarkusCostigan said:
Does anyone know exactly how to elect US LLC as opaque in Malta? What is the procedure exactly?
Click to expand...
Speak to a law firm in malta, there are plenty but not that many. Hope it helps. I don't want to share any names because I was accused of being a service provider apparently by one of the MODERATORS because I was critical of CYPRUS in comparison to Malta, then the guy started talking about mountains and hills in cyprus lol, which for me as an Italian is difficult to differentiate in English
 
A1988 said:
Speak to a law firm in malta, there are plenty but not that many. Hope it helps. I don't want to share any names because I was accused of being a service provider apparently by one of the MODERATORS because I was critical of CYPRUS in comparison to Malta, then the guy started talking about mountains and hills in cyprus lol, which for me as an Italian is difficult to differentiate in English
Click to expand...
Thanks for your contribution, very interesting indeed. As I understood, a US LLC was treated as opaque "automatically" by Malta, but apparently this is not the case.

Anyway, it would be interesting to know if with this setup it is still possible to pay 5% for income generated in Malta (For example if the LLC has no substance anywhere)? Or is it only 15%(??) paid on remittances?

For example, US LLC ---> Owned by Holding outside Malta ---> Requested in Malta for Opaque status --> Is it possible to request a refund of 6/7?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu