Serious, do you consider Telegram to be secure and private?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anything that asks for your phone number and your contacts is not taking your privacy seriously

Toggle signature
Expat in Hong Kong - There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt. - John Adams
 
reesek said:
telegram is also open source guys
it is as safe as any cloud storage, true
but there are private chats that go p2p only
Click to expand...

Note entirely true, because it is not entirely open-source. Part of their infrastructure (server side I believe) is proprietary, which is a huge issue for privacy reasons.
 
"Session" seems to be a decent alternative, end to end encryption and no phone number.
 
Hrtc said:
"Session" seems to be a decent alternative, end to end encryption and no phone number.
Click to expand...

Session doesn't route attachments, but stores them on the server.
Sessions is a comp from Australia, and Aus has the most aggressive approach on e2e, so I think its a decent alternative, but not the best.
If I had to choose I would go for an app without cental server. I can assure you any app that has a server no matter how encrypted can be cracked and read by authorities if persistent enough. And this happened recently. Image below explains a lot for confused users.

niboe_mensajeria_info_06_eng-1.png
 
Signal and Signal forks like Session are the best. Signal has proven cryptography and sealed sender means that they couldn't get metadata even if they wanted to. Signal also has an open source server and client. Wickr only has open sourced their cryptography library and Threema only has open sourced their client. The best is XMPP with OMEMO but that's pretty difficult for normal people to set up and it doesn't work as good on mobile. Just register Signal using a burner phone or Account activations via SMS | Receive SMS online | Smspva or a similar phone verification service.
 
telegram owner is a member of the WEF

There is a nice blockchain p2p app called crypviser which is outside of officals radar because its so unpopular.
Its even working in Dubai or China
 
reallyawesome1111 said:
Signal and Signal forks like Session are the best. Signal has proven cryptography and sealed sender means that they couldn't get metadata even if they wanted to. Signal also has an open source server and client. Wickr only has open sourced their cryptography library and Threema only has open sourced their client. The best is XMPP with OMEMO but that's pretty difficult for normal people to set up and it doesn't work as good on mobile. Just register Signal using a burner phone or Account activations via SMS | Receive SMS online | Smspva or a similar phone verification service.
Click to expand...
Signal lately hosts its server with Amazon so I would be careful.
Use P2P with VPN for max security better.
 
santogrial said:
Session doesn't route attachments, but stores them on the server.
Sessions is a comp from Australia, and Aus has the most aggressive approach on e2e, so I think its a decent alternative, but not the best.
If I had to choose I would go for an app without cental server. I can assure you any app that has a server no matter how encrypted can be cracked and read by authorities if persistent enough. And this happened recently. Image below explains a lot for confused users.

niboe_mensajeria_info_06_eng-1.png

Click to expand...
So Jami, Tox and Briar should be the best ones? Which of the 3 is the bestest?

Toggle signature

@JohnnyDoe ”“ Your #1 Source for Guidance in Different Offshore Fields

 
crypviser way better than briar
no middle men attack possible which briar is not capable to provide also p2p and no centralized server .
There is even a message bomb feature which destroyes messages from both devices after x time
 
369 said:
crypviser way better than briar
no middle men attack possible which briar is not capable to provide also p2p and no centralized server .
There is even a message bomb feature which destroyes messages from both devices after x time
Click to expand...
U talking about briar or cryptviser in the desc? Since u described briar and you wrote cryptviser lot better 😀
 

Do you consider Telegram to be secure and private?​


Mostly not but for most things is ok. Most gray biz deals dont need turbo maximum impenetrable communication systems anyway.
 
Its full of scams, hucksters, terrorists, child P**N... etc... I'd hazard it's pretty 'secure/safe' - but is tied to a mobile number (physical or digital).


Somewhere there will be data-linkage etc.
 
wellington said:
Its full of scams, hucksters, terrorists, child P**N... etc... I'd hazard it's pretty 'secure/safe' - but is tied to a mobile number (physical or digital).


Somewhere there will be data-linkage etc.
Click to expand...
What you list there may be the case for all anonymous and secure messengers ?!

Toggle signature
I do services that no one does at OffshoreCorpTalk - Get in touch with me e-mail - Do you have a problem, get in touch. Be clear to what you want, sneaky questions are ignored!
UK LTD with Nominee Shareholder & Nominee Director, passport and utility bill available, 2 days delivery - learn more!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu