If there were 500 opt outs you would need to make 500 wire requests to transfer the money to each person. I am not sure what the issue it.
Euro Pacific bank is a scam
- Thread starter sonato
- Start date
- Status
For the last year, Pete has been blaming the receiver and a bunch of other characters in this saga for the Novo fiasco, and now he admits he caused the mess. If the receiver was the one who submitted the wire requests and caused the delay, then everyone should rightly blame him, but now there's evidence that Pete has been trying to distance himself from the mess he caused.
The bank submitted the requests. All 500 or so opted out and provided wiring instructions. The bank forwarded those instructions to Novo. Novo should have processed the wires. But instead they filed a suspicious report with the Portugese government due to the false media reports the bank was closed for money laundering and tax evasion. They did not want to facilitate those crimes themselves by processing wires for known money launderers and tax evaders. Then the Portugese government froze the bank's account for six months︀ while it did its own investigation regarding alleged money laundering and tax evasion. Since it︁ found no evidence of either, the freeze was lifted.
What are you referring to. I admitted no such thing. I didn't cause the mess. The bank tried to return the money. But because of the BS OCIF/J5 press conference the Portugese government would not allow Novo to send them out. Novo of course was happy to keep the deposits and the interest for itself. So the Portugese government gave them the excuse. But there was also no reason for the OCIF Commissioner to put the bank into receivership. There was no valid reason to deny the sale of︀ the bank. Had the sale been approved no deposits would have been tied up for︁ even one second. How is any of this my fault?
No, I disagree with you. Why would have Peter caused a mess by submitting 500 wire requests. There's nothing strange or abnormal here. Each client would have received their own funds. It was Novo that caused the mess as per my understanding.
First, they gave themselves︀ a reason to keep other people's money when the interest rates went higher and perhaps︁ they thought that their over-suspicion could bring some bonus to them in terms of relationship︂ with their government/tax authority.
It always helps when you show whose side you're on.... Don't︃ you think that we have simply accepted the new normal that consists in feeling almost︄ guilty to make use of our own funds and ask a permission to do so︅ from the banks ? It's utterly offending to have to explain where, whom and for︆ what ! Back to basics: beneficiary, routing data, wire order. Period.
First, they gave themselves︀ a reason to keep other people's money when the interest rates went higher and perhaps︁ they thought that their over-suspicion could bring some bonus to them in terms of relationship︂ with their government/tax authority.
It always helps when you show whose side you're on.... Don't︃ you think that we have simply accepted the new normal that consists in feeling almost︄ guilty to make use of our own funds and ask a permission to do so︅ from the banks ? It's utterly offending to have to explain where, whom and for︆ what ! Back to basics: beneficiary, routing data, wire order. Period.
The last report says total balance around 47Millions shouldn’t it be 66? Or am I reading something wrong ?
Today I filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against former IRS Chief Jim Lee, OCIF Commissioner Natalia Zequeria, the OCIF appointed receiver, Simon York of HMRC, Will Day of the ATO, two other J5 tax Chiefs and three reporters, for conspiring to deprive me of multiple Constitutional rights. There was no valid reason for the OCIF Commissioner to reject the sale of the bank to Qenta. I can prove she told multiple lies to justify her action. There was no reason to put the bank into receivership. The bank was closed as a PR stunt for the J5, so they could pretend their failed Atlantis︀ investigation was a success. Corrupt "journalists" helped by publishing les. They all lied that the︁ bank facilitated tax evasion and money laundering, so the J5 could take credit for closing︂ it down. But their own investigation, as well as the independent investigation of OCIF, found︃ no evidence of any financial crimes. The bank's customers were sacrificed to pull off this︄ PR stunt. You guys can file your own class action lawsuit if you want to.︅ I think you have an excellent case. I can't include customers in my lawsuit, as︆ I have no standing to sue to recover their losses.
Good luck to you Peter. I hope justice will be served for the people who got hit the hardest by this nonsense.
Good luck but the legal fees is going to run into the multi millions of dollars if you lose once all appeals etc are exhausted. Your on the hook for all those deep pocket legal defense bills if you lose. But your good to absorb the loss just in case I guess.
- Status