Euro Pacific bank is a scam

Status
Not open for further replies.
indeed, this⁤ can be very expensive for Mr. Schiff.

Anyway, its a clearly conspiracy by authorities and⁣ the odds are with Peter. For us, customers, we want our money back - but⁢ in case Peter wins this process in the just, open the track for 3000 new︀ sues against the authorities (one per customer affected).
 
It's not⁤ loser pay in the U.S. So it's very unlikely I would have to pay the⁣ attorney fees of the defendants if I lose. But you are correct in that I⁢ could end up paying a lot of money for my own legal fees.
 
Can the receiver use the‍ receivership estate assets to defend a legal case brought to him in his official capacity⁠ as an appointed receiver while carrying out his duties? I am no legal expert but⁤ I hope this was investigated before actions were taken. Otherwise clients money could be drained⁣ in protracted litigation at an alarming rate.
 
I don't think he can use the bank's asset to defend against⁣ a personal lawsuit filed by me against him? But he likely has insurance to cover⁢ this.
 
When suing him on a personal basis it is clear he cannot⁠ use client funds. But your suing him in both an official and personal capacity as⁤ you confirmed above. So can he use receivership assets [client funds] to defend himself in⁣ his official capacity as receiver?

I don't know how it works in US but I⁢ would double check with your legal team before there is a nasty surprise here with︀ more delays and clients funds getting eaten by some expensive legal bills.
 
My lawyer said he can't. I am not suing the bank. I'm suing him. Even︀ if it's in his capacity as trustee, he can not use the bank's money to︁ defend against a personal lawsuit against him as trustee of the bank.
 
I REALLY HOPE YOU WIN!

I would love to see a headline on‌ a Newspaper:

"Peter Schiff wins the lawsuit against the Commissioner and the IRS agent that‍ closed his bank."
 
Legally he couldn't do that, but everything is possible in a Banana‍ Republic.
 
I doubt it. If anything it will create an incentive to speed‍ up the process. The unnecessary delay if part of my lawsuit. Its damaging my reputation⁠ and costing me money. In fact, but for my lawsuit, he may never return the⁤ money. He just keeps coming up with excuses not to.
 
seems partly like a PR stunt. Tax officials from Australia, Canada, Netherlands and UK enjoy‌ functional immunity for offical acts during their duty and can not be defendants in a‍ lawsuit in a foreign court. His attorney Lanny Davis should really know that...
 
Lanny Davis is not the attorney for this action. Those foreign officials⁤ came to the U.S. to participate in a press conference and made false and defamatory⁣ comments about the bank as part of the conspiracy. They repeated those comments after the⁢ press conference. We argue that their appearance in Puerto Rico to commit a tort makes︀ them subject to U.S. jurisdiction. Even if I they end up being dropped as defendants,︁ at least hey've been named to highlights their guilt. But they are not immune as︂ you say. I could certainly sue Simon York in the U.K. under U.K. law, which︃ is actually very good on this subject.
 
If Puerto Rico is really a banana republic like where I live I would watch‌ your back as life is cheap in some places sadly when pursing local people in‍ court 🙁. Lost a friend to this type of situation so if you don't know⁠ who is who and how they may be connected to underworld take strong measures to⁤ protect yourself now.
 
I had about 10 grand in gold at the bank, probably closer to 15 now.‌ It is not much, but If I get it back (from Quenta) I wouldn't mind‍ putting it all in a class action lawsuit. If we let this slide they will⁠ just keep doing it to other people. One agency in one country is bad enough,⁤ but now you have a whole syndicate going after people.
 
Once we have served the primary defendants I will post the lawsuit online, so everyone‌ can read exactly what happened.
 
Hi Peter,
You say you are not sure and you doubt that this will delay the liquidation and⁤ not sure if coustomer deposits will be used by Reciever to cover legal fees? .⁣ According to the receiver we are only weeks away from beginning the actual liquidation and⁢ return of funds....
My question is : are you not jeopardizing the return of deposits︀ to customers by filing this lawsuit now? could you not just wait with this for︁ a few weeks, until the process is approved ?
 
I don't think so. I hope we are weeks away, but I don't⁢ trust the receiver. But if anything my lawsuit should put added pressure on him to︀ return the funds. But i needed to file. First, there is only a one-year stature︁ of limitations for my claim. My argument is that I idid not discover hard evidence︂ of the conspiracy until April of this year, when I got the IRS emails in︃ response to my FOIA request. Also I wanted to file before the election. I want︄ the incoming PR governor to know I'm suing the prior administration, not her's. So I︅ filed the day before the election.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu