Could this be the beginning of the end of KYC?
- Thread starter jafo
- Start date
He is stating the obvious, therefore nobody will listen. And Ursula will do the contrary.
There is no practical reason, and today much less than in the past, for being subject to any KYC at all in financial affairs. It’s another of those tyrannical rules that people have slowly become accustomed to and no longer even notice.
XMR fixes it.
There is no practical reason, and today much less than in the past, for being subject to any KYC at all in financial affairs. It’s another of those tyrannical rules that people have slowly become accustomed to and no longer even notice.
XMR fixes it.
The politicians and apparatchiks will never give up that lever of control. They don’t care if your data gets hacked. They think it’s better that way so they can respond to the outcry and “fix” things by passing even more restrictive laws to control you.
They love this, an extralegal shortcut to your data, or a way to outsource the dirty work to other criminals.
But what about their own data (or the data of their loved ones...assuming they have the capacity for "love")?
I don’t think that chief EUSSR gynecologist and arms dealer Ursula needs to have anything in her own name. Her and her circle of friends laugh at the problems they create to their subjects. They live in a different world.
Typically they become exceptions to standard rules since taxpayers fund their luxury and anonymity. Personal assistants handle the details and most firms maintain PEP protocols. These hypocrites also avoid paying said taxes and exclude themselves from the surveillance laws they impose on others.
Also in the edge cases, law enforcement suddenly has capacity when handling data related to these Politically Exposed Parasites.