As we would say in Britain
<iframe src="
f**k Off National Football League GIF by NFL - Find & Share on GIPHY" width="480" height="252" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="
">via GIPHY</a></p>
I disagree.
What he is doing, if these funds are from a legitimate inheritance, whereby he has paid the tax is removing them from a 3rd world despot regime into the West (Europe) where he resides, he is utilising methods which are utilised daily by people all across the globe to remit their funds around arbitrary 'created' restrictions︀ from a state that would rather see them diminished to nothing than be productive within︁ his hands.
These activities like stated are very common and carried out millions of times︂ a year by people fleeing or having fled or inherited wealth from those that fled︃ in prior years.
As long as he show source of wealth, and pays the relevant︄ taxes, and has no qualms with never setting foot in said despot country which is︅ not a sanctioned state as far as the public records then he should be good︆ to go.
As this is quite common it is clearly defined this occurs and the︇ European Union has no qualms with inbound funds that have moved outside of capital controls︈ as long as the standard AML processes are carried out.
So no, i fully support︉ a individuals right to move around arbitrary rules which are constructs from a despot regime.︊
---
My wife's fathers family fled Maos China generations ago and they did it with︋ silver and gold.
I see this as no different.