Euro Pacific bank is a scam

[Radko]

I don't know what the Judge will order, but a‍ lawsuit can easily take 2 o more years to resolve, by then the liquidation of⁠ EPB will be over.

The million dollar question is, will Qenta return our assets and⁤ our cash whenever the Receiver sets an official migration date?

 

[Sam1Sam2Sam3]

I imagine that Qenta is⁤ working on ways not to return the cash. Also think they could be working with⁣ the receiver then this would all make sense. Can a motion to replace the receiver⁢ be brought?

 

[Radko]

The only one that can replace the Receiver is OCIF.

 

[Sam1Sam2Sam3]

The depositors need to‍ bring the writ or anyone with a financial vested interest.​

​

Puerto Rico Supreme Court⁠ and First Instance Courts​

Puerto Rico law clearly states that a writ of mandamus⁤ may be issued only by:

• The Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, or
  
• The Court of First Instance of Puerto Rico,
  

and must be issued in the name of the⁣ Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

 

[Vqn]

When you say official migration⁤ date, is that the date for starting distribution if funds to customers?
I’m sure there⁣ will not be any migration to Qenta anymore ….

 

[Alpinist]

Without TRO⁣ we are really standing on thin ice.

 

[Radko]

The official migration date is when Qenta officially owns the assets⁠ and they can be distributed to customers as those assets become liabilities to customers.

That's why I said that whenever the Receiver sets an official migration date, if Qenta doesn't⁤ return the assets and the cash, it would be considered stealing from customers.

I hope⁣ Brent De Jong doesn't become the next Bernie Madoff.

 

[Sam1Sam2Sam3]

I don't mind if the assets are returned to the receiver or to myself, whichever⁤ is more feasible. What I am worried about is the fact that Qenta has them⁣ and they have no legal right to keep them. Since they have proved themselves to⁢ be untrustworthy whats to say they don't squirrel them away somewhere and then disappear? Time︀ is of the essence

 

[Radko]

I doubt that Brent De Jong⁣ is so stupid, stealing the assets would have legal consequences.

It would be "easier" to⁢ file for Bankruptcy, and since Qenta is a Fintech company and it's not insured, we︀ would lose our money.

For now it seems that Qenta is trying to keep as︁ much money as possible legally. First by trying to negotiate with the Receiver, who has︂ declined to do so, and now by trying to negotiate a cash deal with each︃ Opt-in customer.

 

[Sam1Sam2Sam3]

https://ffnews.com/people/brent-de-jong/
https://www.inclusivecapitalism.com/member/brent-de-jong/
https://theorg.com/org/qenta/org-chart/brent-de-jong
Wonder how Brent's standing would go if other organisations were to find‌ out about this?

 

[Sam1Sam2Sam3]

so time⁢ is of the essence

 

[Martin Everson]

I am following the thread but don't have anything of value⁠ to add so stay quiet.

I would say I would like to know the current⁤ financial status as their actions smell of desperation when you consider the optics of what⁣ they are trying to do. There seems no concern for protecting their reputation by current⁢ actions taken or how it will be perceived by the public. Hopefully they are not.........︀

 

[sillybollocks]

Brent De Footlong is in⁣ the middle of a divorce from his wife. He probably has plans to use this⁢ money to pay her off. Just have a scan on the internet its all over︀ plus his many failures. Guys a crook.

 

[sillybollocks]

I've reached out to an investigative journalist‍ in the US who exposes fraudsters. It's a very well known publication so just waiting⁠ to see if they have interest in exposing Brent De Mongo.

 

[Sam1Sam2Sam3]

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ny-supreme-court/117261920.html

 

[Martin Everson]

Yup I didn't want to mention his divorce as didn't think it was relevant to‌ issue. But may explain a state of mind.

Lets just leave his personal life alone‍ for now.

 

[Martin Everson]

I posted this case a while back already.

 

[sillybollocks]

Divorce is very relevant to this issue⁠ if he plans on using a 3rd party to take our monies so he can⁤ pay her off and walk off into the sunset with our hard earned moolah. All⁣ cards should be on the table as he isnt showing us any mercy and far⁢ from it.

 

[Mario68]

Good day for everybody. I´m getting a little bit confused. I hope not to bother‌ all of you with a brief timeline of mine:
(1) Before I knew and joined‍ this group, I sent an email to Receiver asking for information (May22nd)
(2) July 1st⁠ - Receiver answered asking for "all the papers" that prove I´m an EPIB customer with⁤ right to ask questions on the issue.
(3) As at that time, only Opt out⁣ were supposed to send those documents I decided not to do so without more information,⁢ and luckily I found you.
(4) Jul 12th Qenta sent mail informing of the Termination.︀
(5) As that made of me an Opt-out (regardless of my opinion) and being close︁ to the deadline to send documents, I sent them on Aug 1st., just in case︂ and although Receiver had uploaded a notice on July 21st informing that "Consequently, the disposition︃ of these assets must be subject to individual negotiation and direction from the respective account︄ holders." (Regarding assets under "control" of Qenta)
(6) Aug 15th sent an e-mail to Qenta︅ asking them to Wire Transfer my cash and another one to the Receiver asking to︆ transfer Silver to Schiff Gold. With no reply from neither of them.
(7) Aug 20th︇ Mr. Schiff uploads an update informing that "the Receiver is now requiring all silver owners︈ to complete a full set of compliance documents before he will even consider transferring your︉ silver. "
First Question: Does this mean I must send the full set again, although︊ I sent them before, just before the "official deadline" on Aug 4th?
(8) Regarding the︋ e-mail to the Receiver (sent to his personal address) Mr. Schiff also explained that "If︌ you sent an email to him and did not receive a reply asking for additional︍ compliance documents, you should resend your instructions to his preferred address: ......" , which is︎ my case.
Second Question: Shall I send the mail again, although the Receiver´s notice of️ Aug 19th says "... Your message has now been forwarded to the correct electronic mail‌ address. "?
Wish you all the best, and hope we can all get our assets‍ back as soon as possible. Highly appreciate being within this community and having Mr. Schiff⁠ helping us to achieve our common objective.

 

[Martin Everson]

Well this could be the case but that would be speculating. Others have done far worse⁤ when faced with expensive divorces sadly. But lets maybe leave this speculation alone as we⁣ don't know the details.