Yes, what happend to the bank's customers was a crime. Blame the IRS, ATO, HMRC, OCIF, and Nick Mckenzie. After the fact, the Receiver is also to blame.
There has never been a reconcilliation of the money owed to Opt-in or Opt-outs. The $19 million that Qetna has was not related to actual Opt-in balances. It just happened to be the balance that was in the bank's IB account that was transferred to Qetna. The reciever and Qetna were supposed to reconcile the amounts, but never did.
Yes, all US dollars where in the bank's IB account. They went to Qetna. All the︎ foreing currencis were in the Novo account. They went back to the bank, and the️ Reciever had them convereted to USD. But a reconcilliation was never done to determine what was owed to Opt-ins and what was owed to Opt-outs. That's another reason the Receiver should have joined my legal action to compell Qenta to return all cash and other assets to the bank. I have never wittnessed a greater breach of fiduciary duty than what the Receiver is doing. I actually think its worse than what Qenta is doing. But the worst offender is OCIF. OCIF never should have put the bank into Receivership in the first place. Plus, they never should have appointed the Receiver they did. They︀ should have replaced him long ago, but they absolutely should replace him now based on︁ what he's allowing Qenta to do.
What customers recover in the lawsuit will go into a trust accont which will be destirbtued to plantiffs. This will be much quicker than what the Recevier is doing.
so if some of the opt in customers cash is actually with the receiver but we are suing Qenta then how can we get it? Perhaps the lawsuit should compel the reconcilation to be done with a deadline?
It's a mess. But anything left over after Opt-ins are paid belongs to Opt-outs. But its also possible some of the cash Qenta holds belongs to Opt-outs. There is no way to know as I still don't even have a list of Opt-outs or Opt in. If I did i could easily figure it out has I have the complete customer list,︀ which includes what everyone owns.
@ Peter Schiff or any other legal expert. If Brent de Jong and Qenta did sell the clients gold, how will they be able to justify it in a court of law?
They did. But thier foreing currencies were converted to USD. The original plan was to send all Opt-out cstomers euros, pounds, or wharever foreign currency they had. If they held USD the bank needed to convert to euros or pounds to wire it out. That's because the bank lost its USD correspondent and it's Fed account due to the false alligations of money laudering and tax evasion.