Yes, and the receiver walked away from his reponsibility and︀ just outsourced it to Qenta. I tried at my own expense to do his job︁ for him, but the Federal judge wouldn't let me. He basically said if the Receiver︂ doesn't do his job, then the customers are screwed.
Technically there are no moe Opt-in︃ customers, as the deal they Opted into doesn't exist. Qenta never onboarded them as customers︄ prior to terminating the Purchase and Assumption Agreement. Customers didn't opt into a situation where︅ Qetna holds their assets in its own account and they have to pay Qetna half︆ of their deposits to get any of their money back. Aslo the smaller accounts aren't︇ even geting the "opportuity" to do that. Qetna is just keeping their money. They certainly︈ didn't opt into that. Yet the Receiver is sitting back and letting it all happen︉ claiming it's not his reposibility and the federal judge wouldn't let me do anything as︊ he ruled it is the Recievier's repsonsility, not mine. Well if I can't protect the︋ customers assets and the Reciver won't they, who will? The answer is that customers have︌ to protect themselves. Meanwhile, OCIF, which unneccedssairly creadted this situation, sits back and does nothing︍ either, leaving the Receivrer in change so it's impossible for anyone else to maximize the︎ value of assets for the bank's customers or other creditos. The OCIF Commissioner took control️ of the bank away from me and handed it to the Receiver under the pretense that a Receiver was needed to protect customers. But customer's didn't need any protection until she placed the bank into Receivership. Now they need protectoin from the Receiver, who has truned his back on them while preventing anyone else from protecting them.
Technically there are no moe Opt-in︃ customers, as the deal they Opted into doesn't exist. Qenta never onboarded them as customers︄ prior to terminating the Purchase and Assumption Agreement. Customers didn't opt into a situation where︅ Qetna holds their assets in its own account and they have to pay Qetna half︆ of their deposits to get any of their money back. Aslo the smaller accounts aren't︇ even geting the "opportuity" to do that. Qetna is just keeping their money. They certainly︈ didn't opt into that. Yet the Receiver is sitting back and letting it all happen︉ claiming it's not his reposibility and the federal judge wouldn't let me do anything as︊ he ruled it is the Recievier's repsonsility, not mine. Well if I can't protect the︋ customers assets and the Reciver won't they, who will? The answer is that customers have︌ to protect themselves. Meanwhile, OCIF, which unneccedssairly creadted this situation, sits back and does nothing︍ either, leaving the Receivrer in change so it's impossible for anyone else to maximize the︎ value of assets for the bank's customers or other creditos. The OCIF Commissioner took control️ of the bank away from me and handed it to the Receiver under the pretense that a Receiver was needed to protect customers. But customer's didn't need any protection until she placed the bank into Receivership. Now they need protectoin from the Receiver, who has truned his back on them while preventing anyone else from protecting them.