Wyoming, Delaware or New Mexico, please tell me what's your choice?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You should receive original letter confirmation to your mailing address stated⁤ on SS4 form. If mailing address is in the US, you will get the letter⁣ in 2 weeks. If it is abroad, you might wait for 2-3 months.

Where do⁢ you intend to open bank account? Normally banks are fine with a simple written EIN︀ confirmation you can do yourself. Just inform the bank that you were given the number︁ orally, US banks and online banks almost never ask for official EIN confirmation.
 
I have not SSN, so I can use only Mercury? or may be you know︀ other banks?
Simple written confirmation: like I confirm that Company LLC EIN is xxxxx?
 
Mercury is fine with the EIN faxed back from IRS, make⁠ sure before applying to have a real business, a good Web page (that’s helped me⁤ a lot!) and professionally written information on your Web (including a good About Us). Original⁣ EIN will be mailed to your legal address (should be your registered agent’s office) but⁢ usually for bank account the IRS fax should be enough.
 
as I understood Mercury⁣ open bank account with Evolve and Trust bank, the same as Transferwise. May you know⁢ any possibility to open account with real bank?
 
Evolve and Trust is the backend of several Fintech, not just Mercury, of‍ course they can open a bank account directly but from what i understood you are⁠ not a resident, so we are talking about an account you can open remotely. If⁤ you are physically in US, better go to Wells Fargo or other major banks.
 
Because they aren't that efficient, sometimes they mess‌ up when someone sends multiple times the fax. That's why some people recommend to send‍ it only once (but I guess that if you have been waiting for months then⁠ shouldn't be an issue to send it again)
 
This is how I have used WY and DE and UK together.

Firstly:
1) I‌ am a privacy nut. Because of the legal work I do outside of dayjob, I‍ have used the following setup. It doesn't provide complete bulletproof privacy, but it's enough. LLP⁠ seems to be better when working with legal entities in the UK (tracing agents etc)⁤
2) It is not the cheapest, but it works for me, and the setup pays⁣ for itself
3) The banking works fine

The method is "build it backwards", as this⁢ should explain. I'll refer to the following using the ficticious name "Acme". Where I mention︀ "office lease" this is not the same as a virtual office - you actually get︁ a legal valid lease, notarised, which proves the right to use the address
1) Form︂ Acme LLC in DE - I am the named member - apply EIN - full︃ virtual office with office lease provided
2) Form Acme LLC in WY - I am︄ the named member - full virtual office with office lease provided
3) Form Acme LLP︅ in UK in my own name. I am one partner, Acme UK Ltd that I︆ own is the second partner. This is in effect the same as a "single member"︇ LLC. For all intents, the taxation is the same (passthrough)
4) Open account using DE︈ LLC with Mercury.io
5) Open Starling account or Tide account in UK. I personally find︉ Tide easier to deal with. Also have iZettle for CNP, and TW for people who︊ prefer to pay that way.

Once this is done:
1) Acme LLP is replaced by︋ myself with DE LLC - some limited personal protection
2) Internal resolution to make DE︌ LLC member-manager of the WY LLC
3) Update Registered Agent in WY to send post︍ to DE
4) Update Registered Agent in DE to scan / post all mail to︎ the LLP

Trade:
1) The "front facing" company is the Wyoming LLC. Why?
1.1) Holds️ no assets
1.2) Very difficult to financially attack
1.3) Only state in the USA that‌ allows "lifetime nominees", which means I can predraft nominee agreements to point the LLC somewhere‍ else if anything does go wrong

Banking:
1) I try and use the DE LLC⁠ for payments were possible, for privacy
2) If this isn't viable, I invoice through LLP⁤

Taxation:
1) LLP invoices DE LLC for commercial services (eg trademark license) for full value⁣ of what is raised, this is remitted to the LLP
2) The UK Ltd which⁢ is the partner of the LLP then invoices the UK Ltd for services.
3) Benefits:︀
3.1) Taxation passthrough LLC > LLP > UK Ltd - draw money using "low wage,︁ high dividend" route
3.2) I don't suffer tax personally being a member of the LLP,︂ although I do have to pay some additional Class NICs as "self employed"

Other benefits:︃
1) UK facing company if required
2) USA facing company if required
 
This is good stuff! thu&¤# As you say it may not be completely bulletproof︃ but I think it's as good as it gets.
 
I don't understand why you need both WY and DE in your setup.‌ Couldn't you have used only WY instead?
 
1) The WY is the‍ front end. If it gets attacked, the rest of the structure is safe
2) The⁠ DE is the one with the EIN and bank account
 
1) WY LLC: Public face. Holds no assets. Nothing to gain if it's attacked
2) DE LLC: Banking, EIN, invoicing
3) UK LLP: Remits funds legally from DE LLC
4) UK Ltd: Draws profits from the UK LLP - most paid is corporation tax at‍ 20% as opposed to invidual rate at 40%. Also makes the LLP "single member" managed⁠
 
DE 900USD per year
WY 600USD per year‍

Worth every penny, so to speak.

1) Proper office lease, with contract. This is a⁠ useful document when needed to prove residency. As they are both CMRA, online validation of⁤ identity is required.
2) Option of dedicated phone number with phone bill in LLC name⁣
 
If I could just add a note, for anyone considering NM don't bother IMHO. I've‌ had people think it's in Mexico itself, and other institutes not willing to deal. From‍ my own dealings, NM LLC seems to be the bargain basement of LLCs and not⁠ well liked.
 
If you are invoicing through the DE LLC, that will⁣ be the one attacked, not the WY LLC.
If you have an active business, yes⁢ it make sense to separate it from your passive assets. But you need to do︀ all active activities through that same entity (including invoicing). If you start billing from DE︁ for your WY activities, then you are commingling and piercing the company veil of the︂ WY entity.

Usually, active entities can be open in any US state as the inside︃ liability protection is the same everywhere. However you want that entity owned by a holding︄ in WY or DE to get the charging order protection, to make sure that any︅ outside liability issue (ie you getting sued personally) won't be able to propagate to your︆ assets. In addition WY offers anonymity (DE needs to use a nominee).
 
How likely are these states to share information with EU?

Would these be good jurisdictions‌ for EU persons?

And can US companies (Wyoming, Delaware, New Mexico) open accounts in non-US‍ countries (Swiss accounts, Singapore accounts, etc...)?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu