Very easy to answer: US deep state, senate and lobbies (those behind the senators).
As for Soros, it seems quite obvious that an illegal trend like the african migration into Europe that requires massive amount of money and logistics cannot be put up, let alone endured, without the green light of︀ the US. Even the money come from there (or from the Saudis, basically US safe︁ deposit box, who paid for the last of the US wars in the region, btw).︂
Ask yourself also why no media has ever had a coverage on where all the︃ money behind this comes from, who's behind all this etc.
No private society without the︄ green light of the USA and its deep state and secret service could manage that.︅ Look at panama papers: they popped open like nothing. On this: radio silence.
How easy︆ would it even be to go interview some of the migrants and expose what's behind︇ this? But nothing, 0, nada. I remember reading half of an interview of a northern-african︈ muslim terrorist arrested in the very early 2000, promising that the worst was just about︉ to start (so true). After that, 0 intel on the causes.
So the actual question︊ is not who but why. Again, frankly speaking, easy explanations are the most plausible. And︋ 20 years after the beginning, and after having been able to see the effect of︌ this strategy, it's easy to guess.
The trend started very early 2000, right after introduction︍ of EUR, right when Europe was rising and trying to unite even more.
Now ask︎ yourself: why would the US be happy about a strong and united Europe, a homogeneous️ european society and a strong economy and currency (EUR) that, back then, some even started to hypothesize could take USDs place in many kinds of transactions? Especially when they themselves, example of cultural integration, are a fucked up society where they ended up killing each other at home?
Fear of loss of power has triggered the libyan war for much less
That's by the way the same reason US finally realized the threat is now China, that is large, powerful, homogeneous or actively and effectively treating separatists. And we see the amount of aggression they can't even publicly hide to try to contain such a geopolitical opponent. As China is not (yet) backing off, we can easily expect further public︀ escalation of hostility over there.
And that's the same reason their main goal is always︁ to "export democracy" everywhere.
As for Soros, it seems quite obvious that an illegal trend like the african migration into Europe that requires massive amount of money and logistics cannot be put up, let alone endured, without the green light of︀ the US. Even the money come from there (or from the Saudis, basically US safe︁ deposit box, who paid for the last of the US wars in the region, btw).︂
Ask yourself also why no media has ever had a coverage on where all the︃ money behind this comes from, who's behind all this etc.
No private society without the︄ green light of the USA and its deep state and secret service could manage that.︅ Look at panama papers: they popped open like nothing. On this: radio silence.
How easy︆ would it even be to go interview some of the migrants and expose what's behind︇ this? But nothing, 0, nada. I remember reading half of an interview of a northern-african︈ muslim terrorist arrested in the very early 2000, promising that the worst was just about︉ to start (so true). After that, 0 intel on the causes.
So the actual question︊ is not who but why. Again, frankly speaking, easy explanations are the most plausible. And︋ 20 years after the beginning, and after having been able to see the effect of︌ this strategy, it's easy to guess.
The trend started very early 2000, right after introduction︍ of EUR, right when Europe was rising and trying to unite even more.
Now ask︎ yourself: why would the US be happy about a strong and united Europe, a homogeneous️ european society and a strong economy and currency (EUR) that, back then, some even started to hypothesize could take USDs place in many kinds of transactions? Especially when they themselves, example of cultural integration, are a fucked up society where they ended up killing each other at home?
Fear of loss of power has triggered the libyan war for much less
That's by the way the same reason US finally realized the threat is now China, that is large, powerful, homogeneous or actively and effectively treating separatists. And we see the amount of aggression they can't even publicly hide to try to contain such a geopolitical opponent. As China is not (yet) backing off, we can easily expect further public︀ escalation of hostility over there.
And that's the same reason their main goal is always︁ to "export democracy" everywhere.
