US Withholding tax on royalties solutions

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is none, there was a new treaty proposed in 2010 to overwrite‌ the 1979 one with an LOB but has not come in effect apparently, so yes‍ you are right that would be an option as well.
 
In the case of software at this point the best one is Cyprus using IP‌ Box Regime to obtain 2.5% CIT

Apparently there is no way to obtain 0 %‍ tax rate ,am I correct?
We can leverage a low taxation using some eastern europe⁠ countries but cannot achieve 0 % from what I understood from the discussion so far.⁤
 
Well legally I haven't found an option for 0% tax,⁣ maybe someone else has. But you can always risk it with the UK LLP setup.⁢
 
If you want to risk wouldn't be better using a US LLC with no public⁠ records and sign a W8BEN with your home country documents instead of a UK LLP⁤ ?
 
Some guy told me to dig into British Columbia⁠ LLP, it has no public records, I'm reading now about that.

Using US LLC not always good, because there is a risk that they⁢ can tax you because you are using US company.
 
If you use a pass-through LLC and are not a US Person I⁠ do not understand how they could tax you.

I may have found another solution by⁤ moving to Portugal with the NHR program. I read that foreign royalties are not taxed.⁣ Since Adsense (as of June 2021) now count the money they pay you as royalties⁢ (in fact they apply the 30% WTH which is applied only to certain incomes like︀ royalties or dividends) moving to Portugal and receiving the money directly from there can be︁ seen by the Portuguese tax man as foreign royalties (you can even show them the︂ W8BEN you signed with IRS and that they consider it as royalties) and Portugal has︃ a tax-treaty with the US. Is this something that make sense?
 
I have not read above, if this has been mentioned, but the only country with‌ no LOB provision in itas treaty with the US is Hungary. Hope this helps to‍ the discussion
 
Are you sure that the new⁣ double tax treaty is already in force? The old one has no limitation of benefits⁢
 
Even Berlusconi used Hungarian companies‌ to save money on US royalties 😉
 
Since Hungary is the only country with no LOB‍ provision in the treaty i thought if using a Hungarian limited partnership would work.
 
A Hungarian partnership would be a transparent vehicle for tax purposes and should not meet‌ the tax residency for claiming benefits of the Treaty. Therefore if it is a partnership‍ it cannot claim Treaty benefits
 
Hungary does not accept the concept of flow-through entities, so why would the US accept‌ such a classification for a partnership?
 
You say that a‍ Hungarian limited partnership is regarded as an opqque entity for tax purposes in Hungary? If⁠ this is the case then maybe it would affect the interpretation of the treaty. Obviously,⁤ It has to be looked into the text and context of the treaty.
 
I am not just saying but you can⁤ also check that Hungary does not recognize the concept of flow-though entities. As a kind⁣ remark I think these type of advices should not be given by someone who is⁢ not intimately familiar with a country's tax system. Half-knowledge is dangerous
 
Yes you are right. I did⁤ take it for granted that a hungarian llp was an see through. thank you for⁣ pointing this out and @marzio should take note of this.
 
This is the way intelligent conversations can be done,⁠ even on the internet 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu