UAE clarification of Freezone Qualifying Income
- Thread starter joffreylol
- Start date
- Status
Well even that wasn't so clear but it shows the trend and what most people familiar with the UAE since several decades already suspected -︀ most people remain 0% Corporate Tax and the Definition of "Being Creative" is most likely︁ taken to another level.
We introduce 01.07.2023 an in-house Accounting Department with Accounting Manager︃ and Accounting Assistant as a Corporate Tax Filling has to be done no matter what︄ - this is the main point of the OECD by the way - having some︅ paperwork in place as of now the UAE itself doesn't know the books of 100s︆ of thousands company while this may work if you are a Marshall Islands but it︇ doesn't work in the long run for a Growing Economy being on the News like︈ the UAE.
Because it takes time for further clarifications - the FTA for sure is︊ overhelmed now and it takes some weeks - I mean it took 3 weeks to︋ get a word of mouth confirmation to some of the Big 4 Partners.
No Freezone︌ published anything either yet - they are all waiting for further FTA Clarifications.
We introduce 01.07.2023 an in-house Accounting Department with Accounting Manager︃ and Accounting Assistant as a Corporate Tax Filling has to be done no matter what︄ - this is the main point of the OECD by the way - having some︅ paperwork in place as of now the UAE itself doesn't know the books of 100s︆ of thousands company while this may work if you are a Marshall Islands but it︇ doesn't work in the long run for a Growing Economy being on the News like︈ the UAE.
Because it takes time for further clarifications - the FTA for sure is︊ overhelmed now and it takes some weeks - I mean it took 3 weeks to︋ get a word of mouth confirmation to some of the Big 4 Partners.
No Freezone︌ published anything either yet - they are all waiting for further FTA Clarifications.
Well, I'm literally waiting for my entry visa and already registered a company. I guess I should have done a bit more research. I had a Dubai agent too not tell me anything about this. He said if your business is outside UAE no tax. I like others, offer it consulting to US clients via a US LLC. Not sure what to expect now.
No definitive answers anywhere. Wait and see I guess.
No definitive answers anywhere. Wait and see I guess.
It seems that Fred might actually be right - there will be like a billion exceptions for CIT both for FZCO and mainland companies. Just enough to let 99% of businesses to pay nothing/close to nothing and yet to maintain the image of UAE as a low-tax jurisdiction and not the tax-free wild west. And the authorities will get a nice income from all the filings and some tax from mainland companies.
There's a risk of the IRS saying you have US-source income anyway.
If the US LLC is owned by a foreign company (like your UAE company), then there is the risk of 30% branch profit tax on top.
So far I haven't met anyone who was actually affected by this, but I've spoken to US tax experts and they said it's a real risk.
If the US LLC is owned by a foreign company (like your UAE company), then there is the risk of 30% branch profit tax on top.
So far I haven't met anyone who was actually affected by this, but I've spoken to US tax experts and they said it's a real risk.
My lawyer never mentioned this. Wether it's owned by a foreign person or entity, it would be a single member LLC. Income not generated while in the US would not be US source income. Have spoken with 2 lawyers and neither one said anything about branch profit ? Please any links︀ would be great. I found this which I don't meet these conditions since the work︁ is being performed outside of the United States which means it's not ECI . Also︂ I do not have any operations in the US and no permanent establishment. What do︃ you think ?
The foreign corporation is engaged in a trade or business in the︄ United States. This includes owning real estate.
The foreign corporation has income from business activities︅ or holdings in the United States. This is known as effectively connected income. For example,︆ making money on the sale of U.S. real estate results in effectively connected income.
The foreign corporation is engaged in a trade or business in the︄ United States. This includes owning real estate.
The foreign corporation has income from business activities︅ or holdings in the United States. This is known as effectively connected income. For example,︆ making money on the sale of U.S. real estate results in effectively connected income.
Branch profit tax applies if you have ECI only. If the US LLC is owned by an individual, then there is only tax on the ECI.
But if you have ECI and the US LLC is owned by a company and you transfer money out to the owner of the US︀ LLC - then the branch profit tax applies. It's similar to a withholding tax.
Imagine that a UAE company owned a a US LLC that was operating a restaurant in︁ Miami (no state taxes).
Scenario 1:
The US LLC is taxed as a corporation and︂ makes a $1M profit. It pays the 21% CIT (hope I'm correct about the federal︃ CIT rate). The remaining $790k are paid as a dividend to the parent company. There's︄ no tax treaty, so a 30% withholding tax ($237k) applies. Only $553k can be paid︅ out to the UAE parent company.
Scenario 2:
The US LLC is taxed as a︆ disregarded entity (tax-transparent) and makes a $1M profit. There's obviously ECI (it's a restaurant), so︇ the profit is subject to the same 21% CIT. But except for the ECI, it's︈ tax transparent, so there are no dividends to pay out, so withholding tax on dividends︉ doesn't apply. Without a branch profit tax, the after-tax profit of $790k can be transferred︊ to the UAE parent company without any additional tax withholding.
That's what they wanted to︋ fix because scenario 2 suddenly came with a massive tax advantage. So the branch profit︌ tax was introduced, which simply puts the same withholding tax (additional 30% tax) on any︍ money that is transferred out to the parent company, like a dividend. It's not a︎ dividend though, that's why they call it the "dividend-equivalent amount".
So if you have ECI,️ it's a double whammy situation if the US LLC is owned by a company instead of an individual.
Just google it, there's a lot of info about it, e.g. this:
https://klasing-associates.com/question/branch-profits-tax/
However, there's also at least one positive with a company owning the US LLC: You can avoid the US estate tax.
If you die and you're the direct owner of the US LLC, then there would be US estate tax, at least on all US assets. I'm not sure if the value of the LLC itself would also fall under that.
If you die as the owner of the foreign company owning the US︀ LLC, then the US LLC wouldn't be impacted at all.
Yes, that's the theory. And I've heard that it works perfectly fine like this for︅ a lot of people.
However, if you have US business clients, they only see a︆ US company. And they may send a form 1099 (if I remember correctly), because that's︇ what they would have to do for a US supplier.
They will send a copy︈ to the IRS and say "This US company is doing business for us, a US︉ client". It's not your client's job to assess your tax status. You're a US supplier︊ as far as they are concerned.
From what I understood, the purpose of this is︋ to make it harder to evade taxes.
Basically your client reports your income to the︌ IRS for you "We paid this US company $50k for their work".
Then the IRS︍ will notice "So this US company earned $50k from this US client.... Why didn't they︎ pay any taxes?" (Note that the company being owned by a non-resident alien doesn't automatically️ mean there was no ECI, as in scenario 2 above.)
So now the IRS may come looking for that tax. Or, to put it simply, they may simply assume/claim that there was ECI and then you would have to fight them about it.
And I guess in states like California, the IRS may be extra aggressive.
Yes, it sounded weird for me as well, but that's what both a very reputable (=expensive) US tax lawyer and also a CPA told me. They said it might make more sense to use the US LLC only to market to US clients and then bill from a foreign︀ company (and not the same company that owns the US LLC).
See also this part︁ about form 1099:
https://www.upcounsel.com/when-to-issue-a-1099https://watkinsandco.com/accountant...s-you-need-to-know-as-a-small-business-owner/
You see that your US clients will have to send︂ them. And then the IRS may eventually come asking why you didn't pay the tax.︃
Maybe they will accept your explanation that what you did wasn't ECI... or maybe they︄ won't. I have no real life experience, so I have no idea how big this︅ risk is.
I've head of a lot of people doing this without any issues. But︆ the tax lawyer really didn't think it's a good idea. (He did think it's a︇ good idea to use a US LLC to bill non-US clients, however.)
But if you have ECI and the US LLC is owned by a company and you transfer money out to the owner of the US︀ LLC - then the branch profit tax applies. It's similar to a withholding tax.
Imagine that a UAE company owned a a US LLC that was operating a restaurant in︁ Miami (no state taxes).
Scenario 1:
The US LLC is taxed as a corporation and︂ makes a $1M profit. It pays the 21% CIT (hope I'm correct about the federal︃ CIT rate). The remaining $790k are paid as a dividend to the parent company. There's︄ no tax treaty, so a 30% withholding tax ($237k) applies. Only $553k can be paid︅ out to the UAE parent company.
Scenario 2:
The US LLC is taxed as a︆ disregarded entity (tax-transparent) and makes a $1M profit. There's obviously ECI (it's a restaurant), so︇ the profit is subject to the same 21% CIT. But except for the ECI, it's︈ tax transparent, so there are no dividends to pay out, so withholding tax on dividends︉ doesn't apply. Without a branch profit tax, the after-tax profit of $790k can be transferred︊ to the UAE parent company without any additional tax withholding.
That's what they wanted to︋ fix because scenario 2 suddenly came with a massive tax advantage. So the branch profit︌ tax was introduced, which simply puts the same withholding tax (additional 30% tax) on any︍ money that is transferred out to the parent company, like a dividend. It's not a︎ dividend though, that's why they call it the "dividend-equivalent amount".
So if you have ECI,️ it's a double whammy situation if the US LLC is owned by a company instead of an individual.
Just google it, there's a lot of info about it, e.g. this:
https://klasing-associates.com/question/branch-profits-tax/
However, there's also at least one positive with a company owning the US LLC: You can avoid the US estate tax.
If you die and you're the direct owner of the US LLC, then there would be US estate tax, at least on all US assets. I'm not sure if the value of the LLC itself would also fall under that.
If you die as the owner of the foreign company owning the US︀ LLC, then the US LLC wouldn't be impacted at all.
Yes, that's the theory. And I've heard that it works perfectly fine like this for︅ a lot of people.
However, if you have US business clients, they only see a︆ US company. And they may send a form 1099 (if I remember correctly), because that's︇ what they would have to do for a US supplier.
They will send a copy︈ to the IRS and say "This US company is doing business for us, a US︉ client". It's not your client's job to assess your tax status. You're a US supplier︊ as far as they are concerned.
From what I understood, the purpose of this is︋ to make it harder to evade taxes.
Basically your client reports your income to the︌ IRS for you "We paid this US company $50k for their work".
Then the IRS︍ will notice "So this US company earned $50k from this US client.... Why didn't they︎ pay any taxes?" (Note that the company being owned by a non-resident alien doesn't automatically️ mean there was no ECI, as in scenario 2 above.)
So now the IRS may come looking for that tax. Or, to put it simply, they may simply assume/claim that there was ECI and then you would have to fight them about it.
And I guess in states like California, the IRS may be extra aggressive.
Yes, it sounded weird for me as well, but that's what both a very reputable (=expensive) US tax lawyer and also a CPA told me. They said it might make more sense to use the US LLC only to market to US clients and then bill from a foreign︀ company (and not the same company that owns the US LLC).
See also this part︁ about form 1099:
https://www.upcounsel.com/when-to-issue-a-1099https://watkinsandco.com/accountant...s-you-need-to-know-as-a-small-business-owner/
You see that your US clients will have to send︂ them. And then the IRS may eventually come asking why you didn't pay the tax.︃
Maybe they will accept your explanation that what you did wasn't ECI... or maybe they︄ won't. I have no real life experience, so I have no idea how big this︅ risk is.
I've head of a lot of people doing this without any issues. But︆ the tax lawyer really didn't think it's a good idea. (He did think it's a︇ good idea to use a US LLC to bill non-US clients, however.)
Thanks for the explanation and detail.
So firstly, a restaurant is a physical︎ presence and clearly operating in the US.
I would be doing remote work from abroad️ so this applies the same way ?
If they submit a 1099 as a US supplier, because yes, I am invoicing them from my US LLC, the profit there is pass through to my corp tax residency . How is everyone else doing this ?
So firstly, a restaurant is a physical︎ presence and clearly operating in the US.
I would be doing remote work from abroad️ so this applies the same way ?
If they submit a 1099 as a US supplier, because yes, I am invoicing them from my US LLC, the profit there is pass through to my corp tax residency . How is everyone else doing this ?
Branch profits do not apply to foreign owned single member LLC. It's in the rules. No work, equipment, offices or employees on the ground in US = no branch profits tax. Doesn't matter where your clients are based as long as you have no substance in US. Been told this by at least 5 tax accountants
Guess why I picked that example?
If you have no ECI, no. If you have ECI, yes.
That is false. Branch profit tax ONLY applies to foreign-owned LLCs (foreign owned LLCs that are owned by a foreign corporation, to be exact).
No. No ECI︁ = no branch profits tax.
According to the tax lawyer and CPA I spoke to︂ (I am not making this up!), there is a risk that the IRS could simply︃ claim you have ECI. And then you will have to fight them.
Here's what they︄ told me:
If you came in rarely for client meetings, the IRS would argue first︅ that the LLC is engaged in a trade or business in the US through you,︆ so it has US ECI and that you should be subject to US tax on︇ that income. It is not likely they would pick up on rare visits, but if︈ your customers started filing information returns supporting the payment of fees to the LLC for︉ services, the IRS would look to see how that income is being taxed, and then︊ we get into the argument we would rather avoid. The US customer has no obligation︋ to file an information return for payments to a foreign contractor, but the LLC is︌ a US contractor, so they would want to file a Form 1099
[...]
US customers︍ will file 1099s for payments made to US entities like a US LLC. So to︎ avoid that it would be better to bill the services through another foreign company. Once️ you get into the US tax system, the computer starts asking questions. Client A has filed a 1099 for $10,000. Where is that picked up. We don’t see it, and they send the LLC a form letter saying you have unreported income. We say No because there is no ECI. The IRS might accept that, but they might not and start digging. If you can show you spent 1 day in the US, you would have a good argument that only income associated with that day is ECI, but if I were an IRS agent I would try for more. We escape all that if︀ the billing goes through a foreign corporation for which no 1099 is necessary
And from︁ the CPA:
If the US LLC is billing US clients, it could be deemed that︂ the US LLC has US source income and is subject to US taxation.
Make of︃ that what you want.
Yes, a lot of people are fine with such a setup,︄ despite billing US clients. I only pointed out the risk. And if you are deemed︅ to have ECI (whether you agree or not), then you will have branch profits tax︆ on top of it if the LLC is owned by a company instead of by︇ you personally. That's it.
Btw, I believe this is why some say that a branch of a foreign company can︎ be a good deal if you have local presence.
I think it was @Marzio who was recommending having a Swiss branch of a foreign company? I would imagine you pay️ the 10% or so in corporate income tax (depending on where you register your branch) and then you'd avoid the 35% Swiss withholding tax with such a setup. But I'm not sure.
If you have no ECI, no. If you have ECI, yes.
That is false. Branch profit tax ONLY applies to foreign-owned LLCs (foreign owned LLCs that are owned by a foreign corporation, to be exact).
No. No ECI︁ = no branch profits tax.
According to the tax lawyer and CPA I spoke to︂ (I am not making this up!), there is a risk that the IRS could simply︃ claim you have ECI. And then you will have to fight them.
Here's what they︄ told me:
If you came in rarely for client meetings, the IRS would argue first︅ that the LLC is engaged in a trade or business in the US through you,︆ so it has US ECI and that you should be subject to US tax on︇ that income. It is not likely they would pick up on rare visits, but if︈ your customers started filing information returns supporting the payment of fees to the LLC for︉ services, the IRS would look to see how that income is being taxed, and then︊ we get into the argument we would rather avoid. The US customer has no obligation︋ to file an information return for payments to a foreign contractor, but the LLC is︌ a US contractor, so they would want to file a Form 1099
[...]
US customers︍ will file 1099s for payments made to US entities like a US LLC. So to︎ avoid that it would be better to bill the services through another foreign company. Once️ you get into the US tax system, the computer starts asking questions. Client A has filed a 1099 for $10,000. Where is that picked up. We don’t see it, and they send the LLC a form letter saying you have unreported income. We say No because there is no ECI. The IRS might accept that, but they might not and start digging. If you can show you spent 1 day in the US, you would have a good argument that only income associated with that day is ECI, but if I were an IRS agent I would try for more. We escape all that if︀ the billing goes through a foreign corporation for which no 1099 is necessary
And from︁ the CPA:
If the US LLC is billing US clients, it could be deemed that︂ the US LLC has US source income and is subject to US taxation.
Make of︃ that what you want.
Yes, a lot of people are fine with such a setup,︄ despite billing US clients. I only pointed out the risk. And if you are deemed︅ to have ECI (whether you agree or not), then you will have branch profits tax︆ on top of it if the LLC is owned by a company instead of by︇ you personally. That's it.
Btw, I believe this is why some say that a branch of a foreign company can︎ be a good deal if you have local presence.
I think it was @Marzio who was recommending having a Swiss branch of a foreign company? I would imagine you pay️ the 10% or so in corporate income tax (depending on where you register your branch) and then you'd avoid the 35% Swiss withholding tax with such a setup. But I'm not sure.
Yeah, it's as I described then. Basically how it was in the US before the branch profits tax was implemented.
But there is a risk of double taxation, of having to pay tax both in the country where the branch is located, and in the country where the company has its head office.
I believe especially for multinational insurance companies it is very common to operate with branches because there are some tax advantages for them, but I don't remember the details.
But there is a risk of double taxation, of having to pay tax both in the country where the branch is located, and in the country where the company has its head office.
I believe especially for multinational insurance companies it is very common to operate with branches because there are some tax advantages for them, but I don't remember the details.
I have also asked 3 lawyers so far they all say it's not us source income no ECI, no branch tax. This is really throwing me off what these guys are saying. I have another scheduled call with a diff lawyer now wasting money︀ to rest my anxiety
I have another call with a lawyer this week to confirm what you are saying. I sent them an email they responded with no US tax or branch tax. I will dig in more. They also said definitely no if the US Corp is registered in personal name and not the UAE LLC. But even with UAE LLC likely no branch tax due to no ECI
I have another call with a lawyer this week to confirm what you are saying. I sent them an email they responded with no US tax or branch tax. I will dig in more. They also said definitely no if the US Corp is registered in personal name and not the UAE LLC. But even with UAE LLC likely no branch tax due to no ECI
Just to sum it up. For there to be branch profit tax, three requirements must be fulfilled:
1. ECI
2. The US LLC must be owned by a company (not an individual)
3. Payment to parent company (no BPT is due on money that is reinvested in the US)
As soon as one of the three criteria isn't met, there is no BPT.
If you only work outside the US, there shouldn't be any ECI - in theory.
The risk that my tax lawyer was seeing was that your clients would notify the IRS about your revenue from US clients (form 1099).
This could raise︀ questions with the IRS and they could come looking for the tax - and simply︁ claim you have ECI. Then you would have to prove you didn't have any ECI.︂
Say you were in the US for a couple of meetings with your clients -︃ boom, risk of ECI.
Maybe you have a server in the US (maybe you manage︄ your client's IT infrastructure?) - potentially a risk of ECI (not sure about the US︅ - but in some countries, even a server can constitute a PE).
If you've ever︆ worked internationally, then you know that what is written on paper and how things are︇ handled in practice can differ a lot. I know a guy who was living in︈ two high-tax countries at the same time, he was audited and it cost him $20k︉ in lawyer fees just to help the relevant tax authorities, in which of the two︊ countries he should be paying his 50%+ in taxes.
So what my lawyer was saying︋ - if you want completely to avoid that risk, better don't charge your US clients︌ from your US LLC. Maybe use it to market to US clients, but then bill︍ from a company that isn't related to the US LLC in any way (i.e. don't︎ use the company that owns the US LLC).
Then you completely avoid this risk.
I know that a lot of people successfully use US LLCs with US clients and don't️ pay any taxes in the US, exactly like you're saying.
But I also understand why the lawyer emphasized this risk.
Unfortunately, I think nobody can really tell you if this is a 0.00001%, 1% or 50% risk. I would also guess it will depend on how much business you do in the US.
Please share what your contact tells you - I haven't consulted with any other lawyers. It's not my intent to scare anybody, I'm simply relaying the information I received (and paid a lot of money for).
1. ECI
2. The US LLC must be owned by a company (not an individual)
3. Payment to parent company (no BPT is due on money that is reinvested in the US)
As soon as one of the three criteria isn't met, there is no BPT.
If you only work outside the US, there shouldn't be any ECI - in theory.
The risk that my tax lawyer was seeing was that your clients would notify the IRS about your revenue from US clients (form 1099).
This could raise︀ questions with the IRS and they could come looking for the tax - and simply︁ claim you have ECI. Then you would have to prove you didn't have any ECI.︂
Say you were in the US for a couple of meetings with your clients -︃ boom, risk of ECI.
Maybe you have a server in the US (maybe you manage︄ your client's IT infrastructure?) - potentially a risk of ECI (not sure about the US︅ - but in some countries, even a server can constitute a PE).
If you've ever︆ worked internationally, then you know that what is written on paper and how things are︇ handled in practice can differ a lot. I know a guy who was living in︈ two high-tax countries at the same time, he was audited and it cost him $20k︉ in lawyer fees just to help the relevant tax authorities, in which of the two︊ countries he should be paying his 50%+ in taxes.
So what my lawyer was saying︋ - if you want completely to avoid that risk, better don't charge your US clients︌ from your US LLC. Maybe use it to market to US clients, but then bill︍ from a company that isn't related to the US LLC in any way (i.e. don't︎ use the company that owns the US LLC).
Then you completely avoid this risk.
I know that a lot of people successfully use US LLCs with US clients and don't️ pay any taxes in the US, exactly like you're saying.
But I also understand why the lawyer emphasized this risk.
Unfortunately, I think nobody can really tell you if this is a 0.00001%, 1% or 50% risk. I would also guess it will depend on how much business you do in the US.
Please share what your contact tells you - I haven't consulted with any other lawyers. It's not my intent to scare anybody, I'm simply relaying the information I received (and paid a lot of money for).
Thanks and I appreciate that.
Although I will have a UAE LLC I will not register that as the owner of the US LLC to be︀ safe and keep in my personal name.
I do have a few meetings a year︁ in the US which I will rethink now, and my lawyers response to that was︂ make sure to not sign and formalize any agreements while in the US.
And if︃ you do have to pay tax it would be prorated for the days there ,︄ now will that mean I have ECI ? He didn't think so. I will conform︅ this again though.
Will report back soon
Although I will have a UAE LLC I will not register that as the owner of the US LLC to be︀ safe and keep in my personal name.
I do have a few meetings a year︁ in the US which I will rethink now, and my lawyers response to that was︂ make sure to not sign and formalize any agreements while in the US.
And if︃ you do have to pay tax it would be prorated for the days there ,︄ now will that mean I have ECI ? He didn't think so. I will conform︅ this again though.
Will report back soon
Yeah, I think the problem is that ECI/ETBUS ("engaged in a trade or business in the US") is a very vague concept.
Basically anything happening physically in the US is a potential risk. And then even if they only attribute ECI to the days spent in the US - what is the value of those meetings? An aggressive IRS agent could probably say that, without the meeting, you wouldn't have received that $365k contract. So the ECI is not simply 1/365 (1 day out of 365 per year), but it should be something higher, maybe 20% of the contract sum? That's the risk.
If there︀ is ECI, then there will be US tax in any case - the BPT would︁ be on top of that.
Then there's the UAE side on top of it all:︂
If the US LLC is owned by the UAE company, then it would probably count︃ as income of the UAE company in the UAE, as if the income was earned︄ by the UAE company directly. So if you have a freezone company, it would probably︅ count as income of that freezone company.
However, if you own the US LCC in︆ your own name, then in theory, the UAE could say that your US LLC has︇ a mainland PE in the UAE and that it's basically a mainland company that is︈ completely separate from your freezone company (and if you didn't register for corporate tax, then︉ you risk fines on top of UAE corporate tax). That seems rather far-fetched at the︊ moment, but the new corporate tax rules in the UAE are as clear as mud︋ at the moment.
I think it would probably be best to await further clarifications from︌ the UAE tax authority. Until then, I see two potential solutions to avoiding the tax︍ risk in the UAE:
1. Own the US LLC under your personal name, but register︎ a freezone branch of the US LLC, instead of a UAE company, so it's clear️ how the US LLC should be handled in the UAE.
This might be a better solution anyway as your company would (hopefully) mostly fall under US law and not UAE law (liability etc.).
2. Add a nominee manager to your US LLC. That person should be in a tax-free country or a territorial tax country with very weak enforcement of PE rules. Then, if the UAE tax authorities really should come asking, you could explain that you are not managing the US LLC from the UAE, but that you're just a passive investor. (Can't really imagine they will come asking anytime soon, but if they︀ do, I really can't imagine they'll start questioning your substance outside the UAE...) This approach︁ would also completely avoid the headache with salary, corporate tax etc. - you're just a︂ passive investor, no work is happening in the UAE, no PE, nothing... But that would︃ also mean you'd need some other way to get your visa (like a Golden Visa︄ or a separate freelancer license, or something like that).
It's all quite a mess at︅ the moment, unfortunately.
Basically anything happening physically in the US is a potential risk. And then even if they only attribute ECI to the days spent in the US - what is the value of those meetings? An aggressive IRS agent could probably say that, without the meeting, you wouldn't have received that $365k contract. So the ECI is not simply 1/365 (1 day out of 365 per year), but it should be something higher, maybe 20% of the contract sum? That's the risk.
If there︀ is ECI, then there will be US tax in any case - the BPT would︁ be on top of that.
Then there's the UAE side on top of it all:︂
If the US LLC is owned by the UAE company, then it would probably count︃ as income of the UAE company in the UAE, as if the income was earned︄ by the UAE company directly. So if you have a freezone company, it would probably︅ count as income of that freezone company.
However, if you own the US LCC in︆ your own name, then in theory, the UAE could say that your US LLC has︇ a mainland PE in the UAE and that it's basically a mainland company that is︈ completely separate from your freezone company (and if you didn't register for corporate tax, then︉ you risk fines on top of UAE corporate tax). That seems rather far-fetched at the︊ moment, but the new corporate tax rules in the UAE are as clear as mud︋ at the moment.
I think it would probably be best to await further clarifications from︌ the UAE tax authority. Until then, I see two potential solutions to avoiding the tax︍ risk in the UAE:
1. Own the US LLC under your personal name, but register︎ a freezone branch of the US LLC, instead of a UAE company, so it's clear️ how the US LLC should be handled in the UAE.
This might be a better solution anyway as your company would (hopefully) mostly fall under US law and not UAE law (liability etc.).
2. Add a nominee manager to your US LLC. That person should be in a tax-free country or a territorial tax country with very weak enforcement of PE rules. Then, if the UAE tax authorities really should come asking, you could explain that you are not managing the US LLC from the UAE, but that you're just a passive investor. (Can't really imagine they will come asking anytime soon, but if they︀ do, I really can't imagine they'll start questioning your substance outside the UAE...) This approach︁ would also completely avoid the headache with salary, corporate tax etc. - you're just a︂ passive investor, no work is happening in the UAE, no PE, nothing... But that would︃ also mean you'd need some other way to get your visa (like a Golden Visa︄ or a separate freelancer license, or something like that).
It's all quite a mess at︅ the moment, unfortunately.
- Status