It's the opposite.
Let's take two examples.
Example 1: A German company with an account with ING in Luxembourg sending 2 million USD to pay a supplier in UK with a bank account in UK. No one raises an eyebrow. The correspondent banks in New York just︀ let it pass through. All involved countries are low-risk. It's probably just a routine payment.︁ Billions flow between the countries every day.
Example 2: A Panamanian company with a bank︂ account in Panama sends 10,000 USD to a company in Belize with a bank account︃ in Seychelles. All involved countries are considered high risk. All eyes are on the transaction.︄ This transaction is at high risk of being fraudulent, tax evasion, money laundering, bribe, et︅ cetera. The bank in Panama asks the payer for purpose of the transaction. If they︆ release it, the correspondent in New York might follow up with more questions. If they︇ also release it, the transaction might be held by the recipient's bank correspondent. Now the︈ recipient is asked to explain/justify the transaction.
If you transact in USD, EUR, and such︉ currencies, your money passes through US/EU/other and is subject to checks by banks there. A︊ bank in Panama has practically no financial sovereignty since USD is de facto currency of︋ Panama. (The balboa/PAB is just USD dressed up in conquistador cosplay.)