I think that you missed my point. If the chart of the Russian Ruble was similar to the one for the Euro (e.g., 100,000 to 160,000 without the giant price spike), the increase would appear very similar for both.
But the vastly higher volatility of the Ruble results in chart that is twice as vertical, thereby skewing the visual comparison. In short, the gains by gold︀ were roughly the same for both currencies over the same time period but the Ruble︁ is vastly more volatile.
Stated another way, you cannot remove a giant price spike in︂ order to claim that one currency is less volatile than another. Price spikes are the︃ very essence of volatility.