But it's no different with the Canadian branch. There will be tax in Canada.
JustAnotherNomad said:
But it's no different with the Canadian branch. There will be tax in Canada.
Click to expand...
As soon as we talk about exclusively dealing with crypto in a company, things become significantly easier to handle concerning the requirements you mentioned.marct said:
company would never have a bank account (it would just hold crypto, assets).
Click to expand...
How so?EliasIT said:
As soon as we talk about exclusively dealing with crypto in a company, things become significantly easier to handle concerning the requirements you mentioned.
Click to expand...
You just hide and don't pay any tax.
marct said:
After discussion and much debate, I think I'm going to go simply a WY LLC for operating, and either a DE LLC for holding assets or Seychelles/KY LLC under a nominee for holding assets ”” unsure the best approach currently. The holding company would never have a bank account (it would just hold crypto, assets).
Click to expand...
I'm waiting on my lawyer and a DE law firm I contacted, along with a CPA I've used in Ohio before to respond, then I'll be able to grasp if it's viable.JustAnotherNomad said:
Smart, make all your assets subject to US estate tax.
I mean, yes, there is an estate tax treaty with Canada, so I guess as an alternative, your relatives could then pay the Canadian tax bill + fines instead...
Click to expand...
marct said:
I'm waiting on my lawyer and a DE law firm I contacted, along with a CPA I've used in Ohio before to respond, then I'll be able to grasp if it's viable.
Click to expand...
Would that still hold up with the new travel regulation in Europe?EliasIT said:
If you keep it all in crypto you can avoid anyoe knowing it, that's just what I meant... but best is to find a straight legal way to sort this out,
Click to expand...
You don't need banking and therefore there is no reporting and because of this you don't have to pay any taxes and can hide where you want on this globe. Problem with such setups is that it is not possible to avoid FIAT 100% to live somewhere.
If that's your concern, then you should definitely have a full nominee service for your company, even if you choose to establish it in a country or on an island where ownership information is not publicly available!marct said:
I suppose it is, but I would prefer privacy out of the box. I'm more concerned about easy public disclosure versus government awareness.
Click to expand...
marct said:
I suspect I'll get a lot of suggestions to just go DE/WY/FL on this, but I'm not a huge fan of the legal system in US or CA, especially with the attack on privacy that seems constant in US&CA.
Click to expand...
marct said:
I'd like to spend something reasonable on it provided it does what I need it to. I know that's not a great answer, but I'm largely unsure what cost I'm looking at. In an ideal world there's the operating company, which will feed all the money off to the holding company. That holding company would be the UBO of the operating company, and I'd sit as UBO of the holding company.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, but I get slightly annoyed when you constantly reply on behalf of others in every thread! It could be that the person I asked had something else to say.daniels27 said:
@sebastian yes, but he did not want to spend that money for it and his wish list is simply too long.
Click to expand...
Got it, thanks!sebastian said:
I'm sorry, but I get slightly annoyed when you constantly reply on behalf of others in every thread! It could be that the person I asked had something else to say.
Click to expand...
I know you haven't read all 7 pages of this thread but did you at least bother to read the very first post, or even the title?5K1PP3R said:
most of the people have transactions showing they bought BTC during the years it was cheap
Click to expand...
You could use an anonymous company setup for the trading company where you won't be listed or registered as UBO anywhere, you need mentor group gold to check the many threads about it there.marct said:
I suppose it is, but I would prefer privacy out of the box. I'm more concerned about easy public disclosure versus government awareness.
I'd like to spend something reasonable on it provided it does what I need it to. I know that's not a great answer, but I'm largely unsure what cost I'm looking at. In an ideal world there's the operating company, which will feed all the money off to the holding company. That holding company would be the UBO of the operating company, and I'd sit as UBO of the holding company.
Click to expand...