@cheektocheek
You missed the point. One solution to CRS is to find a country which has not joined.
The long-term solution is to obtain a second residency or citizenship, and present yourself as someone living in that country to a high street bank in a developed country - better banking options. In this case Paraguay, but in contrast - also Portugal, Belgium work perfectly.
1. With a Paraguayan ID and proof of address, your account will be reported to Paraguay and you pay no tax as per applicable tax laws.
2. As a "Portugese" or "Belgian" - your account gets reported accordingly, and taxes would︀ be due respectively, but you're registered as a non-resident when the CRS report comes in,︁ and no taxes will apply. Giving off an impression of tax residency in a high︂ tax country could be the best option of all.
- You only flash your ID︃ and proof of address to the bank (both of which are real) but you don't︄ tell you're already registered as a non-resident for tax purposes. The bank has fulfilled CRS︅ requirements and is not subject to fines; you pay no tax; and your real country︆ of tax residence is not known to Portugal/Belgium either - so there's even no credible︇ information to push to someone out of scope of CRS (i.e., in the scope of︈ TIEA).
OECD is not a particularly a bright bunch - just a bunch of big-brother-complex︉ sissy boys. I'm 95% sure CRS will fail completely. At one point in the future,︊ the FI's may fall under further pressure to detect #1 or #2. Logically, CRS may︋ introduce IP address logging requirements (solution is to use VPN or safe web proxies every︌ now and then), or card payment tracking requirements (solution is to not use a payment︍ card of hide&seek account). Any further requirements will only bloat the compliance burden, but more︎ importantly - introduce new loopholes to take advantage of (more code = more bugs). rof/% rof/% smi(&%