@zzzzzz:
Bank account transactions are not part of AEOI/CRS.
Transactions are not; but what about the turnover?
Alexmorgan said:
Because i can drain my accounts if that how it works
Click to expand...
Well,
1) that's probably why it is not so
😉 ”“ IMO;
2) as to have money on another CRS-reported account would not yield anything, you would have to convert all into cash/crypto/etc. anyway
😉
Useful links, thanks for pointing at it.
JustAnotherNomad said:
View attachment 5142
Found this somewhere. What about 8.?
Click to expand...
Yes, it might be the point.
pomegranate said:
First of all, 8 is "For all other other accounts". I assume OP was talking about a depositary (or maybe custodial) account,
Second this applies to amount paid or credited (i.e. no debits) "to which the RFI is the obligor or debtor". This is quite specific (e.g. you lended money to the RFI). At least that's how I read it...
Click to expand...
Honestly, everything is possible.
🙁 I can be wrong, of course.
I guess e.g.
@Sols can offer a really qualified insight, if he notices this.
JustAnotherNomad said:
In any case, it would mean that there are fields for "the gross amount paid or credited" in the CRS specification? Wouldn't it be possible that some banks provide more information that they are required to?
Click to expand...
Well, as I have said, everything is possible.
My personal attitude is to see any account in any AEOI/CRS jurisdiction as (another government/taxmen)-transparent. But maybe I am just a little paranoid
😉
Toggle signature
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am just a simple countryman. Anything I say is only a personal opinion, not a certified advice
🙂
If you think it makes sense, you can like it; if opposite, please, tell me, why I am wrong...