Is Bankera or Pervesk safe ?
- Thread starter flashbang
- Start date
- Status
I opened a Bankera account yonks ago, I don't think it was ever used more than 200-1,000 Euro, if that... (can't remember as its years ago).
Hello,
There is an unread message waiting for you at Bankera. Log in to your account to read it.
Had an email from them yesterday about an notification in my account, proceed to login (or attempt) and it gave me some sort of error "Unexpected error. Please contact support".
So guess I am locked out from reading what ever the notification is lol.
So i'd say no.
Hello,
There is an unread message waiting for you at Bankera. Log in to your account to read it.
Had an email from them yesterday about an notification in my account, proceed to login (or attempt) and it gave me some sort of error "Unexpected error. Please contact support".
So guess I am locked out from reading what ever the notification is lol.
So i'd say no.
They ask for SOF even for requesting increasing your card's spending limits.
They want six months bank account statement to have the limit increased, otherwise, they deny the request.
Is this normal to apply SOF for a simple request to increase the spending limits lmao ?
The account has never been used yet, is brand-new, with literally zero transaction history - meanwhile, they want to do SOF on me, lol.
They want six months bank account statement to have the limit increased, otherwise, they deny the request.
Is this normal to apply SOF for a simple request to increase the spending limits lmao ?
The account has never been used yet, is brand-new, with literally zero transaction history - meanwhile, they want to do SOF on me, lol.
Same here. A joke of a bank.
Toggle signature
@JohnnyDoe ”“ Your #1 Source for Guidance in Different Offshore Fields
Have no clue, there are tons of suggestions around the forum, you may google search.. or you can check the resource database in mentor group
https://www.offshorecorptalk.com/resources/
https://www.offshorecorptalk.com/resources/
what's wrong with Bankera. They always want new documents and it's never enough. I rarely used Bankera and didn't even transfer a total of 200-300 EUR in small amounts between my accounts. Then I had to fill out a questionnaire, it wasn't accepted, now they want a BANK statement for 6 months 😉 and address verification..WOW
I have enough EMIs in my phone that work well, so my question is: Is there any point in clarifying everything with Bankera and using the bank account, or better Close it? What would you recommend?
I have enough EMIs in my phone that work well, so my question is: Is there any point in clarifying everything with Bankera and using the bank account, or better Close it? What would you recommend?
I managed to log into mine earlier today -> used a VPN.
I am guessing they've since banned my current country whereas︀ no issues via VPN from neighbouring state...
There was︇ the big laundering fiasco a few years ago in that neck of the woods... suspect︈ they are overly covering their arse now....
I am guessing they've since banned my current country whereas︀ no issues via VPN from neighbouring state...
There was︇ the big laundering fiasco a few years ago in that neck of the woods... suspect︈ they are overly covering their arse now....
If you trace it even little from web:
1. Bankera was on of the largest ICO's in Lithuania. Collected in total 150m worth of crypto.
2. They promised to token holders tons of s**t. Coin went busto. Token holders were promised with dream that Bankera will become a bank someday and the project will succeed.
3. The money collected were supposed to be used for the developing project. However it was not.
4. Lithuanian authorities started legal action against all individuals in the scheme. It is still ongoing and not settled.
5. They purchased the Private Banking Services from the ICO collected money and moved︀ all assets to that bank supposedly thinking they will be able to hide it AND︁ full-fill the obligation to token holders that they achieved banking licence.
6. After some of︂ the token holders chasing them to return funds and legal action against them Bankera separated︃ the structures and hired more lawyers to the company with ratio in the company of︄ 80% lawyers and legal department to 20% operational staff.
7. All the companies in the︅ structure operates very poor and company is cash negative.
8. Overall money is gone, services︆ are not working, products is just a case to token holders to show that something︇ was "achieved".
1. Bankera was on of the largest ICO's in Lithuania. Collected in total 150m worth of crypto.
2. They promised to token holders tons of s**t. Coin went busto. Token holders were promised with dream that Bankera will become a bank someday and the project will succeed.
3. The money collected were supposed to be used for the developing project. However it was not.
4. Lithuanian authorities started legal action against all individuals in the scheme. It is still ongoing and not settled.
5. They purchased the Private Banking Services from the ICO collected money and moved︀ all assets to that bank supposedly thinking they will be able to hide it AND︁ full-fill the obligation to token holders that they achieved banking licence.
6. After some of︂ the token holders chasing them to return funds and legal action against them Bankera separated︃ the structures and hired more lawyers to the company with ratio in the company of︄ 80% lawyers and legal department to 20% operational staff.
7. All the companies in the︅ structure operates very poor and company is cash negative.
8. Overall money is gone, services︆ are not working, products is just a case to token holders to show that something︇ was "achieved".
Technically Bankera delivered a bank....
But coin didn't moon 😀
Just an FYI, in 2018/19 anything crypto related became toxic, mainly because of shitcoin speculators screaming all over twitter...
So a lot of projects that were looking into banking were simply rejected and/or the banking solutions they dreamt up became untenerable due to emerging restrictions in the market place.
For the shitcoin speculators they also signed contracts or agreed to terms and conditions, which basically meant they bought a token and the token may or may not be utilisable against x product if x product is delivered...
However when they were down in the secondary markets︀ and projects bleeding capital (mainly marketing) and folded or changed directions they all of a︁ sudden felt they were akin to shareholders.
Fortunately the UK, EU has since determined they︂ were in-fact merely utility token holders not securities.
Thus 2019-2021 bull market was born, and︃ soon (ongoing 2023-2024 bull market..
But coin didn't moon 😀
Just an FYI, in 2018/19 anything crypto related became toxic, mainly because of shitcoin speculators screaming all over twitter...
So a lot of projects that were looking into banking were simply rejected and/or the banking solutions they dreamt up became untenerable due to emerging restrictions in the market place.
For the shitcoin speculators they also signed contracts or agreed to terms and conditions, which basically meant they bought a token and the token may or may not be utilisable against x product if x product is delivered...
However when they were down in the secondary markets︀ and projects bleeding capital (mainly marketing) and folded or changed directions they all of a︁ sudden felt they were akin to shareholders.
Fortunately the UK, EU has since determined they︂ were in-fact merely utility token holders not securities.
Thus 2019-2021 bull market was born, and︃ soon (ongoing 2023-2024 bull market..
I am not referring to︄ the fact are they bad or good. I am showcasing it from position of people︅ complaining about their work style.
MAYBE THEY EVEN DO NOT WANT TO WORK.
cause they︆ already took money and they just need a “case” that they delivered.
Think of this.︇
MAYBE THEY EVEN DO NOT WANT TO WORK.
cause they︆ already took money and they just need a “case” that they delivered.
Think of this.︇
The operating costs of buying a white label banking service in 2017-2018 to offer a credit card (crypto card) was roughly 250,000 USD a year (actually have the quote somewhere and breakdown).
To buy a banking license was something like 10m USD -> but you'd then have issues with corresponding.︀
Lets say they rec 150m$ and it depreciated before they sold to an average of︁ 30m$
That wouldn't have given them much breathing room.
I am surprised they've gotten as︂ far as they have tbh.
The claims are legit FYI... remember their ICO... think i had︄ some of their coins somewhere lol
Alongside other terrible positions : Naga, Plexcoin etc
To buy a banking license was something like 10m USD -> but you'd then have issues with corresponding.︀
Lets say they rec 150m$ and it depreciated before they sold to an average of︁ 30m$
That wouldn't have given them much breathing room.
I am surprised they've gotten as︂ far as they have tbh.
The claims are legit FYI... remember their ICO... think i had︄ some of their coins somewhere lol
Alongside other terrible positions : Naga, Plexcoin etc
I'm aware of several of the accusations already (and I've expressed criticism of Bankera/Pervesk on several occasions). However, since @Kranders has a history of posting an unprompted favorable review of a competing business, it would be prudent to ensure that sources are provided by @Kranders for these claims.
Facts are facts, if they can be backed up. Until then, this looks a bit like a representative of a competing business trying to smear Bankera and Pervesk.
Facts are facts, if they can be backed up. Until then, this looks a bit like a representative of a competing business trying to smear Bankera and Pervesk.
You can find plenty of public information supporting his claims, which form the best explanation for the odd behavior and business model of Bankera.
Toggle signature
@JohnnyDoe ”“ Your #1 Source for Guidance in Different Offshore Fields
- Status