I need a card gateway for my escort ads site. Everone says no

JohnnyDoe said:
Stay away from @ActionMan if you value your time and don't want to waste it.
Ref to: https://www.offshorecorptalk.com/th...to-protect-yourself-from-a-short-guide.46628/
Click to expand...
Hi Johnny, Thanks for your patience! Just to clarify, taking a couple of days to respond due to work, applicants, or other commitments isn't unprofessional or a waste of time””it's simply part of managing priorities.
  1. We're a boutique firm, which means we focus on working with a select group of clients to provide the best possible service.
  2. You mentioned in our conversations having multiple clients. While I won't revisit the specifics of our conversations to maintain confidentiality, I'll say this: onboarding your first client could have went smoothly, but he didn't get back to you, so there is that. and for the second client, even though their volume is very low and spread across multiple sites, I confirmed that we could onboard them as well.
That said, I'll admit there's room for improvement when it comes to communication and standardizing processes. I'm fully committed to supporting my clients””both from the forum and beyond. While PSPs are part of what I handle, my work extends far beyond that.

Sometimes, this means I've had to turn away certain prospects to focus on my core clients. But I'm working on streamlining things, and you can expect things to get even better moving forward.
lagloriacubana said:
This was a red-flag for me - it was as if someone who doesn't have experience got an instruction from a boss who is starting something new in high risk and repeating it verbatim without knowing better.

When I deal with a high-risk processor, I want to hear words like - we can give you X monthly cap, and your CB numbers should be below Y (or Z%) with TC-40 reports not exceeding XX%. Not something like what was written above.
Click to expand...
I get where you're coming from, But let me break this down: the statement about "firm policy" wasn't meant to sound like someone parroting instructions without understanding. It's about setting the tone upfront for what we absolutely will not compromise on, especially when it comes to high chargebacks.

Let me clarify: caps, thresholds, and TC-40 expectations are not off the table. These are always part of a detailed conversation during onboarding and underwriting. Here's how we actually handle it:

  1. Caps: We don't believe in cookie-cutter solutions. Caps are tailored based on your industry, historical performance, and the risk appetite we're balancing with our partners and their acquiring banks. Some merchants might start with conservative limits, but as they prove stability and low CB rates, those caps grow.
  2. Chargebacks: The baseline is usually staying below 1%, as per card scheme rules. For high-risk verticals, there's room for flexibility, but only if you have solid mitigation measures in place, like fraud detection, chargeback alerts, and representment systems. We're not here to make you fit into a box; we're here to work with merchants who know how to manage their risk.
  3. TC-40 reports: These are often overlooked by merchants, but for processors, they're a major flag. Too many TC-40s can scare off acquirers faster than high CB ratios. While we don't slap a hard percentage on acceptable levels upfront, we monitor them closely and work with merchants to address issues before they snowball.
Now, here's why I take a firm line on chargebacks: we've dealt with merchants running shady operations, fraudulent ads, charging customers, and then ghosting on delivery. These aren't just red flags, they're torches burning down the credibility of everyone in the ecosystem. So yes, we're strict about keeping out bad actors because they ruin things for merchants who are legit and just trying to scale.

What I said earlier isn't about shutting down conversation or negotiation, t's about filtering out the ones who think it's okay to fly by night. For serious merchants, everything is on the table. We're open to negotiating caps, thresholds, and all the technical details, but only after we've seen a commitment to compliance and sustainable business practices.

So, if you're serious about processing and scaling while keeping things clean, let's talk specifics. We're here to support merchants who are in it for the long haul””not those looking for a quick cash grab that ends in frozen funds and terminated accounts and ultimately, stain our relationship with our partners .

Toggle signature

One-Stop Solutions

Payment Processing ✓ | Offshore Bank Accounts ✓ | ₿ Crypto On-Off Ramping Services ✓ | High-Risk Industries ✓

Let's connect: DM me on Telegram HERE

Russian, LATAM and MENA : SBP, Visa/MasterCard/JCB/MIR?/wallets available | local OTC/e-wallets available per request.​

 
christ0fer said:
Hello,

I have a legal company registered in greece. The website i am talking about allows users & escorts to place their ads. Currently i am accepting payments with flexepin. Payments are offered as an option for users to move their ad on top, make it premium etc.

All merchant gateways says no because i have no previous history of card charging. I think i tried on most.

Only PayCly said yes, but they ask for 1600$ for setup , plus 350$ monthly and minimum 5000$ withdraw.

I read scary reviews on trustpilot about them. Please, any help would be greatly appreciated!
Click to expand...
emerchant Pay is also a valid options for new business, if they like your business case they will take it. I have applied with two new companies with them, both got accepted.
 

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu