How safe is nominee director service?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Using a Nominee Director and/or Nominee Shareholder‍ is very dangerous.

The nominee shareholder /nominee director of a company LEGALLY own and control the company under ALL Company law in EVERY country.

If you have a Nominee Director⁠ / Shareholder of your company then the banks will INSIST on him being a signatory⁤ to the account.

If the nominee director / shareholder is a signatory to the bank⁣ account (which EVERY bank will insist on), then he has access to all of your⁢ funds in the account.

It is impossible to open a bank account in a company︀ name anywhere in the world without the Directors being a signatory (under Anti-Money Laundering legislation).︁
 
Nominee services as with all︁ other financial products and services have inherent risk. This risk can be managed. Banks cannot︂ insist that a director or a shareholder of a company be an authorized account signatory.︃
 
The risk of using Nominee Directors‍ and Nominee Shareholders has far too much inherent risk.

I would never allow access to⁠ my local bank account by anyone else.

And so I would never allow access to⁤ my offshore bank accounts by a stranger (nominee Director/shareholder)

Yes they can. They will simply refuse to open the account.

It is impossible︀ to open a bank account in a company name anywhere in the world without the︁ Directors being a signatory (under Anti-Money Laundering legislation).
 
Using a Nominee Director is a very‍ common practice. If you are dealing with a reputable service provider and have in your⁠ possession the correct documentation then the danger or risk is little to none.

In most⁤ cases the nominee need not be involved whatsoever in the account opening process and in⁣ fact in most cases has no idea where you have opened an account.

I hope⁢ this information is helpful.
 
False. No bank, no principality has the legal power, and vary rarely have the propensity to‍ attempt to rewrite the Law of Capacities. Anyone can be a signatory with proper authorization.⁠ However there is a movement which would empower the banks to request that only signatories⁤ with at least 1% beneficial interest can be a signatory - however do not believe⁣ this will be so black and white (if successful) or else the mere idea of⁢ a foundation or other similar non-profit would crumble.

Don't do it. In order to make︀ a nominee shareholder legit they have to receive a distribution just like everyone else. Do︁ you want to be legally obliged to pay your nominee shareholder 1%??? Same for director︂ - he must be paid a salary/wage or else is nothing more than a authorized︃ agent with a fancy name. Should a situation arise and you have managed to not︄ perform any more legal blunder, the courts would more than likely perceive you as the︅ director and at the vary least tax you according to any evidence of "living outside︆ your means" (and thats just assuming you adhered to all the other rules correctly)

The game is very simple, but the more you get caught up in "hiding" and "anonymity"︇ - the more complicated it gets and the less the legal rules can benefit you.︈
 
I believe that you⁠ are incorrect. Perhaps you would like to explain what "correct documentation" would over-ride the very⁤ strict provisions relating to the powers and responsibilities of Company Directors under the various Corporations⁣ law

The quote above is incorrect on so many levels.︁

1. No "reputable service provider" would allow one of their Nominee Directors/Shareholder to be exposed︂ to legal liability due to bank accounts being used for illegal and nefarious means.

2. Also, are you saying that a "reputable service provider" and a Nominee Director of a︃ company can absolve themselves of responsibility from links to criminal and terrorist activities by simply︄ saying that they did not know about a bank account that was opened under their︅ Company's name? (Best of luck arguing that in a Court of Law!)

3. Do you︆ really think that any respectable Bank in the world would allow a bank account to︇ be opened without the Director of the Company being the signatory (or at the very︈ least, a written agreement from the Director that a specific person can be a signatory︉ to the account)?

In real, practical terms, it is impossible to open a bank account︊ in a company name anywhere in the world without the Directors being a signatory or︋ guarantor (under Anti-Money Laundering legislation).
 
That is not true. As a professional working int he field for 15‍ years I can tell you unequivocally that the Nominee Directors if not involved in the⁠ account opening process and possessing an indemnification have absolutely no liability for the actions of⁤ others.

Yes, no competent court can convict someone for anything that they had no︁ part in. Apart from this, performing proper DD on potential clients further reduces potential liability.︂

Yes, we do it all the︆ time, with old, well established, respectable banks. Of course a written agreement from the director︇ is in hand, it is called a POA (Power Of Attorney) and again it is︈ commonly used when Nominees are used.
 
You may find all what you need to know at the above links. You will‌ still need to cinsult your agent to find out if he is using corporate or‍ real person nominees.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu