Finance and economics mentoring
New Horizons Paraguay
Ticker tape by TradingView

Euro Pacific bank is a scam

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's very worrying. I only⁣ talked about those companies in this thread back in Mar 2023 below and warned people⁢ then to be extremely cautious of Qenta.

https://www.offshorecorptalk.com/threads/euro-pacific-bank-is-a-scam.30470/post-250297
Out of interest those who opted in︀ to Qenta have they seen any financials of Qenta itself or can they direct me︁ to them?

Maybe @Pschiff can explain some of the due diligence he did on Qenta's︂ financial capacity when engaging them about the bank.
 
I did a lot of due diligence on Qenta. They were also preparing for an‌ IPO through a SPAC. They had a deal which I think would have given them‍ 3$00 million in cash. But it ended up falling through. But they would have added⁠ the $7 million in capital, and been able to restore the bank to profitability.
 
The fact that the receiver by default made everyone who didn't opt out a customer‌ of Quenta makes all of these arguments a bit shallow. It is the receiver and‍ OCIF who needed to background check Quenta and the clearly stated by their actions that⁠ the company was trustworthy and reliable.
Back when it seemed that we could get our⁤ money back Quenta stated that after the liqudation is complete we could immediately withdraw everything,⁣ which I am sure most of us will do if given the oppurtunity.
This whole⁢ debacle will be another loss for Quenta I'm pretty sure.
 
Yes, first Qenta lost the opportunity to own the bank. The bank did have a‌ lot of value to unlock, once it was rebranded under new ownership. The false allegations‍ made by the media made it impossible for me to own it or for it⁠ to operated under a tarnished brand name. Then they lost the opportunity to gain the⁤ loyalty of the customer accounts they purchased. Qenta was to pay the bank $1.25 million⁣ for the opt in customers. The hope was that most would stay on as customers⁢ of Qenta. But based on this long delay I'm sure most will just withdraw their︀ money as soon as they are able. In truth I don't blame them. That's not︁ really Qenta's fault, but that's just the way it is.

This article is OK, but︂ could have been so much better at exposing the fraud of the J5 and what︃ they did to EPB and its customers. Maybe some of you can leave comments in︄ Dutch.
https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/zwakte...2a/Z/rTkCYH3PcUC+UnYzKccrq+tXim57JOuIAHfmtA==
 
Would be nice to see the financials. But then I have no skin in the game‌ just an an abundance of caution for people entrusting the transfer of their assets to‍ a company they know nothing financially about. But then again there is a pattern emerging⁠ for those people taking such actions.

Is this the same Qenta CEO that was involved⁣ with this company going public below? I am just asking.

https://kalera.com/2022/01/31/kaler...-through-merger-with-agrico-acquisition-corp/
It didn't go well⁢ it seems if that's the case....😕

https://www.producebluebook.com/2023/04/04/kalera-files-for-chapter-11-protection-parts-with-ceo/
 
Yes.....does not look good‍ does it?

"The SPAC aaid the decision was based “primarily based on Qenta’s failure to⁠ (i) deliver the Closing Company Financial Statements (as defined in the merger agreement) by the⁤ applicable deadline and (ii) comply with the Financial Information Obligations.”

It backs the point I⁣ made when I asked it would be nice to see Qenta's financials? ca#"! I am not⁢ saying there is anything amiss but would be nice to see.

P.S The SEC filing︀ below from Blockchain Coininvestors Acquisition Corp I read through also to verify the termination.

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1873441/000121390024043595/ea0205819-10q_block1.htm

--- quote start

"As a result of The Qenta Termination, the Sponsor of the Company︁ received 50 Shares of Qenta Common Stock (“Qenta Shares”) to reimburse the Sponsor and the︂ Company for costs, expenses and other liabilities incurred in connection with the Business Combination Agreement.︃ The Company has recorded the Fair Value of the Qenta Shares as an investment on︄ its Balance Sheet and a termination fee on its Statement of Operations as of and︅ for the year ended December 31, 2023 in the amount of $4,070,807. There was no︆ change in the fair value of the Investment in Qenta during the quarter ended March︇ 31, 2024."

--- quote end
 
I was to receive 130 Shares of Qenta for the bank, plus about $5 million︇ payable in cash and G-coin. So I lost all of that when OCIF rejected the︈ sale, so she could help the J5 pretend that its failed investigation was a success.︉ The customers also lost access to their deposits for the same reason.
 
I am not interested in‍ the shares or g-coin as values cannot be determined without proper audited financials. But was⁠ the cash part ($5m) to be paid before or after the assets were transferred to⁤ Qenta?
 
As soon as OCIF approved the sale of the bank, Qenta was required to deposit‌ $7 million in cash into the bank. That would have rasied total capital to about‍ $10 million. That was millions more than the bank needed to be fully compliant with⁠ OCIF's rules. Also, I was to receive 130 shares of Qenta stock, three million in⁤ cash and two million worth of G-coin. The G-coin quantity was fixed at $1,800 gold.⁣ So those G-coin would be worth about $2.7 million today.
 
They are ALL hoping you do this. Then they earn 50% off‌ everything you pay the lawyers. That's going to drag on for decades! stupi#21
 
in which jurisdictions is Qenta regulated? Since when is a SPAC giving credibility? Aren't SPACS‌ used for companies otherwise not fit and proper to list regularly on a stock exchange?‍ I personally can understand why OCIF deemed Qenta not fit and proper to own EPB.⁠ Did you have any other reputable interested parties to buy it? I believe not because⁤ a Puerto Rico IFE without Fedwire membership is pretty uselss I think...

https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/zwakte...2a/Z/rTkCYH3PcUC+UnYzKccrq+tXim57JOuIAHfmtA==
The article⁣ clearly says that there are PENDING investigations open against a couple of clients, now you⁢ know why the Novo funds are NOT released until now
 
Its a tiny number. They would likely have better luck just randomly auditing people on‌ the street. They are under a lot of pressure to find something. So they keeping‍ on grasping for straws. So they do find a few. But these few investigations are⁠ in no way holding up the return of customer funds.
 
How do you know its a "tiny" number? These are only the public known cases?‌ The figure is for sure much higher as there are also pending investigations in other‍ EU countries. For months you claimed there are no investigations and now you say its⁠ just a "tiny" number. It was one of the selling points of your "introducers" to⁤ advertise EPB as a bank in a non-CRS country, who do you think you would⁣ attract with such advertisement?
 
I said there were no criminal convictions, or even charges filed. The bank had thousands‌ of customers. My guess is those who are being investigated don't even have accounts at‍ the bank anymore. The bank closed thousands of accounts over the years for compliance red⁠ flags. So most of the people being investigated likely had their accounts closed long before⁤ the bank went into receivership. I think the bank has received record subpoenas for one,⁣ maybe two customers since it was shut down. I'm sure just about any random bank⁢ has more customers being investigated over taxes than Euro Pacific Bank. Our KYC and AML︀ programs were far stricter than most bank. So more of the bad actors were weeded︁ out.
 
If that is the case, why not release the funds of all other hostages?
surely no other bank in world with clients under investigation will freeze all accounts in a︀ bank because a couple of accounts are investigated ?
 
EU countries investigating everyone who had⁢ an account at EPB. The fact that they are being investigated means nothing at all.︀
If EPB customers were any worse than any customer of any other bank then J5︁ should publish how much EPB customers owed the government before 2022 in unpaid taxes. Someone︂ who misssed a deadline and has a $50 unpaid fine is different from someone who︃ forgot to pay half a million dollars in taxes. Both would be counted as one︄ tax dodger by the J5.
 
sorry but you don't know this because you don't have access to the receiver you‌ are not part of the management and you don't know how criminal investigations work in‍ Europe! These people had bank accounts because they believed in your brand "Peter Schiff" at⁠ your bank otherwise they would have not banked with a non-insured IFE in a banana⁤ republic. It's really annoying that you don't accept that you had your fair share in⁣ this mess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

Forums

User Menu

Login
Community platform by JohnnyDoe © 2025 JohnnyDoe
Top Bottom