Nothing shows the insolvency of the bank, as︉ it was completely solvent, as confirmed by OCIF and the Receiver in the initial liquidation︊ order. The bank had no debts, and held millions in cash and gold than was︋ owed to depositors. I have not dodged anything. I have told everyone on this board︌ what happened to the bank and why. It's been completely beyond my control for almost︍ three years.
Ticker tape by TradingView
Euro Pacific bank is a scam
- Thread starter sonato
- Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
your customers were blocked. No way out. You made a way out with Qenta. And now your customers are stuck with a bankrupt Qenta. But it is out of your control. A little too easy, not?
The court order I linked to shows that the bank has been insolvent for many years. I am unable to find any other liquidation order that says the bank is︀ completely solvent. Can you please upload your copy of the liquidation order to the 9Fraud︁ web site? Can you confirm that the court order I linked to showing the bank︂ as insolvent is a forgery and fake?
Don't you have any way to directly contact the CEO? You did sell the banks customers to them, it's not like you're just some random joe customer who walked in off the street.
A few months ago, you said that Qenta has︃ all customer funds, now a few weeks ago, you said Qenta does not have all︄ customer funds and the deal might not happen. What is happening here? I hope you︅ do understand that a lot of people have lost their lifesavings due to this mess.︆
A few months ago, you said that Qenta has︃ all customer funds, now a few weeks ago, you said Qenta does not have all︄ customer funds and the deal might not happen. What is happening here? I hope you︅ do understand that a lot of people have lost their lifesavings due to this mess.︆
the title here is...EPB is a scam.
PS just sold the bank so that customers could not prosecute him.
that is what i think.
hope i am wrong and that Qenta is fine and will contact the opt in to go on with gold/silver account. As I understand all the cash, also of opt in, should still be with the Trustee. and the Trustee should forward it back to the customers and not to Qenta. PS should support that the cash has to go to the customers and not to Qenta. Do you?
PS just sold the bank so that customers could not prosecute him.
that is what i think.
hope i am wrong and that Qenta is fine and will contact the opt in to go on with gold/silver account. As I understand all the cash, also of opt in, should still be with the Trustee. and the Trustee should forward it back to the customers and not to Qenta. PS should support that the cash has to go to the customers and not to Qenta. Do you?
Blaming PS does not help anyone, but if it makes you guys feel better than I guess it is fine.
Suggesting that PS do anything is kind of pointless since he has no power over anything related to the process.
As far as I remember when the liquidation began we were told there's enough funds to pay everyone. That means that the bank ultimately was not anywhere near bankrupcy.
We can argue about the technical and legal definition of insolvency but I think it is a little bit late for any of this.
On the other hand may I remind you that one of the︀ banks that OCIF killed was simply for operating without a license, which is a trap︁ no bank could possibly avoid so EPB would have gone down either way.
Having or︂ not having enough funds is irrelevant OCIF would have found a way as they have︃ in several other cases.
Suggesting that PS do anything is kind of pointless since he has no power over anything related to the process.
As far as I remember when the liquidation began we were told there's enough funds to pay everyone. That means that the bank ultimately was not anywhere near bankrupcy.
We can argue about the technical and legal definition of insolvency but I think it is a little bit late for any of this.
On the other hand may I remind you that one of the︀ banks that OCIF killed was simply for operating without a license, which is a trap︁ no bank could possibly avoid so EPB would have gone down either way.
Having or︂ not having enough funds is irrelevant OCIF would have found a way as they have︃ in several other cases.
He signed the Qenta deal. In my eyes he is responsible for the Qenta mess. He should take action and a)put legal pressure on Qenta to come forward or b)have the deal off due to Qenta going sour.
Blaming someone else is not correct
Blaming someone else is not correct
Are you suggesting that OCIF and Lugo the people currently in charge did not also sign that paper? I can see their signature on page 9 of the liqudation plan.
Even though the liquidator does not need to answer to the OPT INS since the process is dependant on them they have a legal duty to disclose when OPT INS will be ofloaded to Quenta so that they will know from what date can they demand their assets.
This a duty that Lugo and OCIF has. They must do this. Quenta doesn't know when they will be able to start giving the OPT INS because︀ it depends on the decisions that the liquidator Lugo and the government OCIF makes. This︁ is why Quenta is not legally liable for not diclosing information they don't have. The︂ same with PS. Lugo and OCIF on the other hand are very much in a︃ legal grey area by not providing information regarding OPT INS as they are legally required︄ to do so, and if you would sue them they would probably have to give︅ you the information.
Suing Quenta or PS will give you nothing.
Even though the liquidator does not need to answer to the OPT INS since the process is dependant on them they have a legal duty to disclose when OPT INS will be ofloaded to Quenta so that they will know from what date can they demand their assets.
This a duty that Lugo and OCIF has. They must do this. Quenta doesn't know when they will be able to start giving the OPT INS because︀ it depends on the decisions that the liquidator Lugo and the government OCIF makes. This︁ is why Quenta is not legally liable for not diclosing information they don't have. The︂ same with PS. Lugo and OCIF on the other hand are very much in a︃ legal grey area by not providing information regarding OPT INS as they are legally required︄ to do so, and if you would sue them they would probably have to give︅ you the information.
Suing Quenta or PS will give you nothing.
Can you please le me know if:
1) about the bank statement, you sent a bank statement of both EPB and your current bank or just of your current bank
2) the bank statement should be in English or it can be in another language as well
3) they accept a notarized bank statement as proof of address, as I don't have any utility bill
I've already asked to the trustee but he's not answering.
Thanks
1) about the bank statement, you sent a bank statement of both EPB and your current bank or just of your current bank
2) the bank statement should be in English or it can be in another language as well
3) they accept a notarized bank statement as proof of address, as I don't have any utility bill
I've already asked to the trustee but he's not answering.
Thanks
Did you notarize the proof of address? The FAQs say it's not needed, but instructions provided by the trustee says it must be certified as a true and exact copy of the original.
Also, has anybody sent a bank statement as proof of address, instead of an utility bill?
Also, has anybody sent a bank statement as proof of address, instead of an utility bill?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.