Do cryptocurrency exchanges implement CRS/FATCA?

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is not true.
Based on a fbi report they were already⁣ in 2011 able to trace owners of 98% of all transaction done via bitcoin.
The trace doesn't need to be done via KYC.Its done somewhere else where noone thinks about⁢ it. or even thinks to hide.
 
If you want to make sure to not have to provide KYC or get︀ yout assets frozen for whatever reason i recommend usind decentralized exchanges where non custodial trading︁ is offered.
You high probably need to place your oder with a margin for a︂ trader who will execute it for arbitrage between your order and a centralized exchange.
 
The best exchange is: pancakeswap.finance
The best yield farms: autofarm.network, beefy.finance and‍ acryptos.com
The best (and only?) margin farm: alpacafinance.org

Get a safepal.io wallet to deal with⁠ them. Ledger is very poor.

I am currently making about 4X my normal income on⁤ crypto farming. 100s of percent APYs. What could go wrong? Crypto is perfect. How long⁣ until every dogsbody is making big money like me?!?

There is a fairly good exchange⁢ called Bilaxy. When I signed up they asked for my name and national ID. And︀ by that I mean they just asked me to type them in. I have sent︁ no documents. After I gave them that I was able to deposit/withdraw $xxx,xxx in crypto︂ per day. No fiat.
 
Dear god please no god no.

How to fix this? Just close⁣ all the exchange accounts? Convert your fiat in exchanges to stablecoins?
 
Not sure what you're trying to hide (if‍ anything), but I think a lot of cryptocurrency activity is going to move off of⁠ centralized exchanges in the near future. Instead, we'll see people use decentralized crypto-to-crypto protocols/exchanges more⁤ frequently (UniSwap / ThorChain / etc.). Besides, the use of peer-2-peer transactions to convert to/from⁣ fiat is going to increase; coordinated via decentralized, uncensorable mechanisms like Bisq.

Besides, mixing/obfuscation techniques⁢ are going to become much more user friendly and more widely adopted. This will make︀ it more difficult to trace these types of transactions. Ultimately, governments will have no alternative︁ but to go after developers of these decentralized systems. The most democratic jurisdictions will hopefully︂ find it difficult to justify such extreme measures. Ideologically motivated developers will take risks and︃ find ways to stay anonymous.

Ideally, the world will eventually become less reliant on fiat︄ money as people realize that their governments patronize and surveil them like underage children. The︅ Internet has given people access to knowledge and means to coordinate themselves across borders. I︆ think the endgame is that governments will have to surrender to technology and acknowledge that︇ they are no longer adding much value in the modern world. But that's just what︈ my crystal ball is saying. We'll have to live in the current system for a︉ bit longer, and the transition won't be smooth.
 
I completely agree and just want to add that︉ there were even talks about crowdfunding (CCS) physical protection for Monero devs for example. It's︊ definitely possible govts will go after devs themselves.
 
Woah, that's next level. But a great idea. Love the Monero community's resiliency and ideological‌ alignment.

I wish more of the developers would have stayed pseudonymous in the first place.‍ It's what saved Satoshi. Governments would certainly have harassed him for something.
 
You correct with a statement arguing for⁤ something different to what I answered ns2

As I said the beauty of crypto is that⁣ you don't need to provide any KYC for most wallets, whether you can trace BTC⁢ to a anonymous wallet or not I don't question, but guarding your own privacy can︀ let the FBI trace as much as you like they won't find you if you︁ know what you are doing.
 
Oh men satoshi please stop spreading false information.Bitcoin is a bankers product and⁠ you still don't get it.
 
Only OTC is secure.
Everything which is using internet is traceable.They analyse the⁣ traffic on routers at the backbones and there it doesn't help if you are encrypted⁢ or not.

If you use internet an idea could be using a device which emei︀ can't be traced to you and making the transactions in a mall with free wifi︁ which doesn't need registration
 
If you don't know at all what you're doing, you indeed can't assume privacy. Even‌ if you know what you're doing, you won't stay anonymous if a government is staffing‍ a cyber intelligence team to find you. Look at the Eastern European cyber crime gangs⁠ who only operate over cracked WiFis with Tor tunneled through own botnets, and who have⁤ triple encrypted hard drives with one layer self-developed (to avoid backdoors).

Even they get caught,⁣ because at some point someone makes a mistake. Could be as stupid as reusing a⁢ password that you also use somewhere with your real identity.

Just don't do any illegal︀ stuff and you will be fine. There are many legal ways to make money and︁ still be smart about it.
 
Even then the mall has security cameras and⁠ deep packet inspection for the free wifi...
 
Cyber gangs typically use WiFi antennas to crack Wifis far‍ from their own location. Deep packet inspection doesn't help against E2E encryption.
 
not possible to track which person has done something if‍ mutiple users use their wifi at the same time
 
Okay, following idea:

You setup a mobile WIFI in your car or boat, use a‌ SIM without name for connecting to the net or you drive around in a city‍ until you get connected on someone else home lan.

Now you can do whatever you⁠ want and it will not be traceable to you, or did I miss something?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu