Do CRS countries actually share information with each other?

Status
Not open for further replies.

name

New Member
Apr 24, 2022
43
0
161
I'd love to learn how exactly the system works. I know eventually these questions will be pointless. I'm curious about the current system


1. If I report my income as zero for many years as a tax resident of a EU country (lets call it X), I assume that would raise a red flag, right?
2. In this case would X taxman request information from all other CRS countries (including USA) about me, so they can verify I indeed had zero income?
3. Do CRS countries have a central database of domestic bank account information? If X contacts USA, will USA tell X how much money I have there and activity details?
4. When I'm becoming a non-tax resident, does X automatically request information from all CRS countries about me for the past n years? If I made a mistake in my tax filing, I assume they'd send me a tax bill with punishment?
5. If $100.000 enters my bank account in a CRS country every year (working as a contractor), would X automatically become aware of it, even if I don't tell my bank (or to the jurisdiction of the bank) that I live in X?

For reference, a lambo has more value than my net worth and I'm a non-EU non-US citizen.

Last edited: Apr 24, 2022
 
Not necessarily.

No.

CRS countries store CRS data they receive from their local banks and FI's⁢ etc before forwarding to partner countries tax authority. USA is not part of CRS also.︀

No.

No, unless bank is aware of indicia related to︆ X.
 
@Martin Everson Are you sure?
If that's true, ev*ding taxes would be easy.
Get paid‌ to a bank in the US.
Don't use your US bank from EU (cards, logins,‍ mailing address).
Don't spend too much money.
Don't spend money if you can't show that⁠ its coming from your previous tax residency (or just pay taxes on the money you're⁤ spending)
If you want to spend a lot more money, move your tax residency to⁣ somewhere else and tell the new country that your money in US bank is tax⁢ free.

Really? This doesn't make sense to me. How can they be so inefficient?
 
Look up FATCA. It's true the US hasn't signed up for CRS. That's because they already⁢ had FATCA from before which does pretty much the same thing.

There are older reports︀ of US failing to reciprocate exchange of information under FATCA and while it's still not︁ as efficient and reliable as CRS, relying on US non-compliance is increasingly risky. The US︂ is getting better and better at reporting.
 
As others said, while your country may not be aware or even request reports, it‌ would still be stupid to count on this not happening. All it takes 1 report‍ from somewhere and now they know you have some structures/offshore bank accounts.
 
This sounds like "it takes 1 bullet from somewhere and now you're dead"⁠
Your reply sounds too vague. Can you elaborate with some specifics?
 
The strategy "counting on report failures" is not a very solid one from the get go,‍ especially since there are easy tweaks anyone can do to not worry about reporting any⁠ more.
 
Ok replace⁤ USA with another non CRS country. Point still stands. Looks easy if what Martin said⁣ is true. Is it really easy like that?
 
If your government for some reason gets a report that you have a bank account in‍ whatever offshore country, It wouldn't be crazy to say that they would start looking closer⁠ or put you on some list. There's also information sharing on incorporating offshore companies in⁤ certain jurisdictions afaik.
 
As long as you are uninteresting to your local tax authority, yes, you can get⁠ away with tax evasion this way. A lot of people buy flashy cars, big houses,⁤ invest in businesses, or do other things to draw attention. They are the main ones⁣ to get caught.

I'll break it down a bit further:

It might, especially if you are selected at random or based some criteria︁ for an audit, and you're asked to explain your living situation. If it doesn't match︂ with your income, then you're in trouble.

The point with CRS is that︅ there is no requesting. The information is there already. For non-CRS countries, they might be︆ able to use the older system which used TIEA (Tax Information Exchange Agreement) treaties to︇ request and receive information. But they can't go on TIEA fishing expeditions, they have to︈ have a specific request based on some form of evidence or reasonable suspicion.

Sort of. Data collected under CRS goes from the banks to the︌ relevant authority, and that authority shares the entirety of that database as it relates to︍ each recipient country.

No.

They would prosecute you‍ and do whatever applicable law allows them to do, within reason. They might not send⁠ tax collectors or revoke your passport for a 1,000 EUR tax bill. But if it's⁤ a much larger sum, you might become interesting enough to harass even if you live⁣ abroad (especially if you live in a friendly nation).

Maybe. If they︂ suspect you're lying to them, they can report to multiple jurisdictions

Then most likely, you are not going to be interesting and your︅ scheme will work for now.

*****

However, what's missing here is the banks. While they︆ have no moral issues with tax evaders, they have regulatory issues with them. The bank︇ you hoard the money in might ask you for tax returns that match your income.︈ If you relocate to a tax haven and bring your money there, the new bank︉ there might (also) ask for tax returns that match your income.

If you can't provide︊ tax returns, the bank might refuse or terminate the relationship. Worst case, they even submit︋ an SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) which can trigger law enforcement action. But it's no secret︌ that most jurisdictions have more SARs than they can possibly investigate right now. But SARs︍ don't go away quickly and can be picked up at a later date.

The risk︎ of that depends on what banks you use, where they are, currencies involved, and your️ overall risk profile.
 
What about slowly move the money in from a company setup abroad. That would possibly‌ not rise ant flags anywhere.
 
Tax Evasion 101. Every half-decent‍ transaction monitoring tool set up by someone competent is configured to catch and detect that⁠ kind of behavior eventually. The trick would be to finish before you trigger the checks⁤ (based on time and amount).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu