ADVCASH very bad onboarding service

[andres33]

I tried to open a personal account in avdcash this past week and the result has been disastrous. The onboarding system they have is lamentable. Unable to recognize a document that I sent them. I sent a scanned copy (600dpi) of my EU passport. They reply me that the scan does not allow them to see the data or my face correctly. 😕 From my point of view everything looks perfect and the minimal details are noticeable !!! This same scanned copy has already been accepted by 6 different banks and 4 official organizations
from different countries. Well,..., so to try to resolve the situation I scan again at 1200 dpi, I send it along with another photo of the passport taken with the camera at high resolution. I also send proof of residence, utility bill, residence permit with photography and residence
certificate issued by the town hall and with an official seal.
Reply advcash: "The resolution of your ID is not clear enough. Proof of residency is not accepted ..."ns2
LOL ....!!! They do not accept an official certificate from the town hall or a residence permit with my photo !!!!!rof/%
Incredible the inefficiency of their onboarding managers.
I don't want to imagine what would happen if it were to unfreeze an account. Lucky for me it has been that this occurs without having entered a penny.
So be careful with this company that has a third-world country onboarding service.

 

[Allisgood]

had the same problem with them accepting my ID scan.︊ Opened a Ticket (and uploaded the same scan again & complained) and was verified 1min︋ later...

 

[EliasIT]

I wonder what documents you have provided them with, because I don't recall the issue‌ ns2

 

[user9823671]

Had a similar issue, perfectly clear image rejected. Another rejected as 0.1% of the corner‌ edge was not showing.

Gave up in the end

 

[extremedox101]

i would avoid advcash now because the very poor kyc/aml checks that been going for‌ few years. back in 2014-2017 they had simple no kyc service that did well with‍ exchanges but after that it turns out to be useless .

if you don't know⁠ the famous homeless mexican guy personally .find something more reliable.

 

[EliasIT]

the hooker‌ right, it is the hooker awe¤""%

 

[Raphmark]

I registered seemlessly from Nigeria with no issue at all

 

[EliasIT]

same here.. no issues, not from Nigeria but different other countries.

 

[ivan1911]

I provided all my real docs and had to go to my bank for a‌ proof of address.. etc etc. But once you're set up adv just works perfectly ..‍ it's very specific doesn't do alot of things but what it does , does perfectly.⁠

 

[burden]

agree, had problems with submitting my docs to them in⁤ the first, after second attempt it works and was happy.

I read in the mentor⁣ group gold about some tweaks that helped me a little doh948""

 

[VoletCom]

Hey, we are very new to this forum and this is literally our first post,‌ hope it works out 😎 If you provide details via a private message (your email or‍ the support ticket number), we would be happy to take a look and comment. Sometimes⁠ the type of document is fine but there are other issues that may be preventing⁤ it from getting approved.

 

[user9823671]

Got verified today, resubmitted passport but at a better resolution. I guess that was the‌ initial issue.

 

[andres33]

I explain you how are going⁣ with your institution.
After contact support for complaint:
1º.- I receive email + sms from⁢ support saying that all it's ok after my complaint. Curiously ns2after complaint It take 10︀ mins to say all ok. In 10 mins the compliance find all ok and congratulation.︁
And consequently my account is activated.
2º.- 30 minuts later after the congratulacion I receive︂ an email from officer compliance saying that I must to try to send better copy.︃🙄
On this point I don't know which email to follow. ¿¿¿???gru87¤¤
What it's the correct︄ directive?. It's ok? or I must to continue sending copies of my passport till your︅ system find one that it's suficient good copy?
You have a serious problem with your︆ onboarding/KYC department. I don't know if the problem is due from the software that you︇ are using to recognise the document autenticity or if the compliance officier are not very︈ familiarised with the passport identification.
As I wrote in my previous post , my scanned︉ passport was valid in 5 serious and prestigious street banks, + 2 EMIs, (bank online).︊ My proof residency exactelly the same. You can't compare a perfect scanning oficial document with︋ a ******** foto taken with a camera phone. Evidently I sent also a cam picture︌ taken from my phone and the result was rejected too.
You can't get a picture︍ showing fluorescent holograms and at same time a clear details about the data passport. Why?,...Because︎ to see all the holograms you need to put the passport with an angle that️ it will not let you to read the complete owner data. Evidently that in the‌ case that the focus is to see only all the holograms
All this are referent‍ to the ID document. But if I talk about a certificate from the municipality (where⁠ there are no holograms), I don't understand how it can be better a picture from⁤ camera than a scanned document where you can apreciate really if there is a differents⁣ pixelation and then to discart a possible manipulation by photoshop on the documents.
There are⁢ a very good software to detect this. But always from a scanned document, and no︀ from a picture.
Now the interesting will be to see if the different departments agree︁ on the validity or not of the documents provided (passport, residence permit with foto, utility︂ bill, TIN and municipality certificate). All of them were rejected within a period of 5︃ minutes from when I sent them until I received the answer by SMS and later︄ by email. Too fast to take a responsible decision.ns2
Neither the solution is to accept︅ everything half an hour after a complaint. Because what really worriesfin4774" is if one day︆ I have a frozen transfer and you ask me for supporting documents, your team will︇ not be able to distinguish a real document from an invalid one. And this is︈ what makes me stake out my situation with your EMI. Now I will wait to︉ see if your different departments agree with each other about the validity of my docs.︊ And I will continue to inform the readers of this forum about the progression with︋ your institution.

 

[VoletCom]

It's pretty much impossible to comment on anything you've written without knowing which account it is‌ about. If you would really like to discuss all this, we are going to need‍ your support ticket number or account email. Then we will be happy to publicly comment⁠ on your verification process, if you insist.

 

[andres33]

Obviously I⁤ do not pretend that advcash solve my problem here and publicly. The purpose is not⁣ this. The purpose of this post is to provide information to our community about⁢ the operation and problems that any user of the forum may find and this way︀ they have enough elements to judge whether they are interested in dealing with one company︁ or another. Thanks to this forum, many people can take precautions and avoid problems and︂ troubles. It does not have to be free without consequence that an inept employee of︃ a company harms a client and indirectly the interests of the company by doing his︄ job badly or because he is simply not qualified to hold the position and responsibility︅ that he has or because he does not want to give the trouble of do︆ his job responsibly. I do not intend to claim the company through this post. I︇ only inform the forum users about the problems that I have found and that those︈ who intend to work with you will have a possibility to find.
Financial institutions must︉ to put in its brains that they cannot happily freeze an account or block a︊ transfer due to the incompetence of a compliance employee. And in recent times we hear︋ too much talk about this type of rotten maneuvers that greatly harm users. I am︌ not saying that this is the case of advcash in particular, but it is︍ an increasingly widespread case that users must fight and enforce our rights. It is certainly︎ not always the fault of the banks and we all know that some clients operate️ with some lightness and outside the legal frameworks established by the BEPS guidelines with AML5.‌ But it is also true that many banks and financial institutions do not take the‍ necessary evaluation time before rejecting or blocking a client or an account.
As for advcash,⁠ I can only say that in the last few hours the support team contacted me⁤ to say that everything was in order and that they regretted the misunderstanding. I'm⁣ glad. But it would have been great if from the first moment someone had taken⁢ the trouble to examine my documentation even 10 minutes before rejecting all the documents presented.︀ I hope this is the beginning of a successful collaboration with you. And I also︁ hope that if someone in charge of a bank reads these lines, they will become︂ aware that they must be consistent with their clients and that slip-ups have a price︃ for everyone.
For my part, the incident is closed and ended at this point

 

[VoletCom]

We don't take freezing that lightly. Accounts are never frozen just because of‍ a misunderstanding about the quality of a scan or anything like that.

Overall recently we⁠ employ third party KYC services more and more to make sure there is no subjectivity⁤ in the reviewing process.

We would be happy to tell our side of the story⁣ should you ever want it, possibly in a private conversation. Just to clear up any⁢ misunderstandings. You are welcome to get in touch.

Either way, we are happy this has︀ been settled, we apologize for any human error there may have been, and we hope︁ there will be no further issues.

 

[bronze]

I
Have maybe transferred 250k eur︁ over last 6 months through advcash and no problems
Just wish it wasn't 10k per︂ day and 50 per month limit

 

[andres33]

Exactlly. This is‍ the problem that you have. Transfering the responsability of such delicate matter to other companies⁠ that they do not care about the positive evolution of the company that hires them.⁤ Compliance is a fundamental part of the smooth running of an EMI and outsourcing this⁣ very special piece of machinery always negatively influences the retention of customers. The vast majority⁢ of companies subcontracted for compliance are harmful to the proper functioning of a company. They︀ are only interested in protecting their a*s without taking into account the interests of the︁ company they work for. A EMI need to have his own compliance service. I know︂ that's a budget. Important budget. But it will make the difference between a miserable EMI︃ and a quality and reliable EMI.
Anyway thanks for your sincerity in recognizing your Achilles︄ heel. It is a great point in your favor.

 

[VoletCom]

I never recognized using third party KYC providers is our Achilles heel because it isn't. We‌ do have a compliance department, and it's actually among the strongest in the business I‍ dare say, judging by the amounts of sophisticated fraud prevented and by the fact that⁠ our clients literally from all over the world do not wait days and weeks for⁤ their applications to be processed. In reality, third party providers have been gradually added recently⁣ and they only come after our own manual review in most cases, and in your⁢ case, I'm sure this was not the reason for whatever happened. Third party services have︀ not replaced our own compliance yet and probably never will. If anything, we started using︁ third party providers because people were complaining our own KYC was too strict during credit︂ card deposits. So all in all, with all due respect, you did not quite get︃ that one right about us 🙂 Happy to clarify tho.

 

[JohnnyDoe]

ADV said:
We don't take freezing that lightly. Accounts are never frozen just because of a misunderstanding about the quality of a scan or anything like that.

Overall recently we employ third party KYC services more and more to make sure there is no subjectivity in the reviewing process.

We would be happy to tell our side of the story should you ever want it, possibly in a private conversation. Just to clear up any misunderstandings. You are welcome to get in touch.

Either way, we are happy this has been settled, we apologize for any human error there may have been, and we hope there will be no further issues.
Click to expand...

Try to explain why you reject an application. For example the one for my UK company of which I am the sole director and shareholder

This is what ADVcash support (a “document verification specialist”) replied to my request for information:

“Our Compliance department had a decision to deny verification of your account without any comments. No need to upload documents again.

The decision is final, it cannot be changed. Additional comments cannot be provided either.”

They rejected the application for a UK company of which I am the sole director and shareholder. Italian passport.

Stay away from ADVcash! If this is how they handle such a simple task, imagine what they can do when you have an issue with your funds!
Thanks god they rejected my account.

Last edited: Dec 26, 2021
Toggle signature

@JohnnyDoe ”“ Your #1 Source for Guidance in Different Offshore Fields​