UK Digital ID pushed through the Kaiser

[polonieth]

Not really answering my question. The point made was the following:
This suggests that if you are critical of how the UK is run, then⁠ you should revoke your citizenship to "put your money where your mouth is"

Asinine IMO,⁤ it's the equivalent of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It's a valuable passport⁣ based on the country's history. Revoking it only makes sense in a limited set of⁢ circumstances (or if you foresee some sort of worldwide taxation, exit tax etc) but to︀ do so based on the mismanagement of the last 20 years is shortsighted.

I mean︁ it can all change pretty quickly. Probably won't seen as though they are leveraging the︂ division to bring in more state powers.

It's also a blue passport...

 

[manukahoney]

I am sorry, but that's utter bollocks. Citizens MUST be critical of their‍ governments and hold them accountable, otherwise they quickly turn into dictatorships.
Passport is an instrument,⁠ its value directly dependant on the country's image in the world. If the country is⁤ going downhill the passport will lose its value and might become a liability (like Russian⁣ passport for instance), that's when you drop it. And having several passport is a great⁢ option for those who have means to acquire them.

 

[clemens]

Which passports would you suggest would be good to‍ hold, countries?

 

[polonieth]

Where did I⁢ say citizens shouldn't be critical of their governments? Straw man garbage.

You post I quoted︀ made the point that in order to back up your criticism, you should revoke your︁ citizenship to somehow prove it. I am saying that's nonsense

 

[manukahoney]

It depends on one's heritage and resources. I would aim for a strong EU‍ passport with no taxation tricks (UK used to be a valid option) and maybe a⁠ Caribbean passport as an option B. If you have Jewish heritage - you are set,⁤ the same goes for some Eastern European passport (like Hungarian).