False. The newest guidance from the Revenue Department in early 2022 explicitly allows for classification of crypto income as foreign-sourced, provided that the trading︀ platform is located abroad.
Van Laarhoven︅ had a long -term dispute with the authorities in the Netherlands about his cannabis sales.︆ He moved to Thailand and sent his entire wealth of $ 10 million in Thailand,︇ then purchased real estate and other Thai assets. This money was obtained from the sale︈ of cannabis, which even in the Netherlands is a gray area. Illegal, but allowed by︉ a convoluted tolerance policy.
The Netherlands authorities sent letters to Thailand which deliberately mischaracterized Van︊ Laarhoven as an international drug trafficker (read them), presumably out of spite from the long︋ running dispute. Even with their damning content, initial letters were ignored, and the Netherlands escalated︌ several times before achieving any result.
Finally, Thais realised that they were able to condemn︍ Laarhoven, because the money was after all from illegal drugs and, therefore, to catch $︎ 10 million. You can imagine how the assets would be distributed. At this moment, with️ an increasing publicity, the Netherlands saw the mistake, but it was too late. The Thais were bound to the guilt of Var Laarhoven, because any appeal success would raise the problem of returning the confiscated assets and where they went.
Normally these shakedowns are practiced on local Thais. Local black money is plentiful, no risk of international incidents. One must see the case of Van Laarhoven, $ 10 million Thai assets and a criminal pretext delivered gift wrapped by Netherlands, as an exceptional situation.
Is there a single case of Thailand pursuing a foreigner sending in living expenses from offshore portfolio or offshore company?