Euro Pacific bank is a scam

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good reasons why the judge should order preliminary injunction︃ and demand Qenta returns the assets to the Trustee …
 
Yes, that was part of my‍ agrument. I said that Qenta's precarous finaiancial position made it imparrarive that the bank's assets⁠ be retuned to the bank ASAP, as I did not want them to get tied⁤ up in a potentila Qenta bankruptcy.
 
If Assets Are in Company Accounts

If money is in an account in Qenta’s own‌ name (e.g., operational funds), it legally belongs to Qenta.
  • In bankruptcy, we opt ins become‍ an unsecured creditor,we would only get paid after secured creditors, and possibly only a fraction⁠ of our claim (sometimes nothing).
Peter, do know are the funds now under Qenta’s own⁤ name ?

Also it can be so that Qenta and receiver have a common interest.⁣ Sure we still remember the last message from the receiver and he never asked us⁢ to complete claim form with required documents officially.

“I hope that no one else in︀ Puerto Rico is involved in this case with their own interests.”
 
The silver was in an accoubt for the bank. The⁢ mutual funds are in an account for Euro Pacific Securities. The cash may be in︀ a Euro Pacific Securities account too, I'm not sure. I don't know where the gold︁ is being held. But based on the terms of the Purchase and Assumption agreement, I︂ think customers are secured creditros, as it the Agreement clearly reads that Qenta is custodingy︃ those assets for Opt-in customers. So those liabiliites are secured by those assets.
 
“I would be happy to see all these documents in written, rather than just making‌ assumptions.”
 
Of course OPT-IN clients cash money has been mixed together with Qenta´s other operations. https://9fraud.com/purchase-and-assumption-agreement-for-euro-pacific-bank-assets-with-qenta-inc/ says NOTHING about seperation of funds (well done Peter, nice deal you signed there!) within‌ Qenta, so it is just mixed together in pooled fund. The smart guys at Qenta‍ can easily drag this out for 2-4+ years in court and play this dirty. And⁠ all signs are that they will! When this much money at stake, they could also⁤ easily "suddenly go banktrupt". Nasty nasty ending for OPT-IN will be the end!
 
They could have‌ done that anytime up to now and they haven't.

There's no basis for claiming that‍ Qenta intends to misappropriate the funds; in fact, they contend they plan to return the⁠ capital - just at a reduced value.
 
Yes, they have had three years to do that. I think they are trying to⁠ cloud their theft in the cloak of legitimacy. First they tried to get the Receiver⁤ to sign off on a deal to legally allow them to keep customer money. Since⁣ that didn't work, now they are going directly to customers. But I think this amounts⁢ to fraud, as they are concealing imortant facts from customers to get them to agree︀ to make deals they would not make if Qenta was honest about what they are︁ trying to do.
 
You are wrong. I may not be a︅ lawyer, but I have had several lawyers review the agreement, and they agree with me.︆

There are two conditions precident for the initial closeing to take place. First is that︇ all regularoty aprovals are secured and in place. Second, that all liabilities related to the︈ assets have been assumed by Qenta. Neither condition was met. Qenta has admitted to this︉ fact all along. Here is an excerpt taken from an email Qenta sent to an︊ Opt-in customer in Jan. of this year. In this email, Qenta admits that it is︋ still waiting for regulatory approval before it can onboard Opt.-in customers and assume the liabilities︌ related to the assets it held in custody. The Receiver's initila letter to Qenta is︍ incorrect as a matter of law. That is the only source of confusion. I am︎ hoping the Receiver will realize he got it wrong and join in my legal action️ to force Qenta to return 100% of the assets to the bank, without any offsets.‌

"As an Opt-in client, there is no needed action from your end as Qenta is‍ also, unfortunately, dependent on the receiver's office in finalizing their liquidation process with OCIF before⁠ the migration of Opt-In clients can begin. Regrettably, the process continues to be ongoing and⁤ there has been no specific date of completion set at this time. Once finalized, Qenta⁣ will send invites via email to Opt-In clients to download the app and immediately begin⁢ the sign-up and onboarding process. Once onboarded in the app, clients may cash out at︀ any time through their bank account or other payment channels such as PayPal or Payoneer."︁
 
Ah yes, the old trope of attacking someone︅ (who has obviously received extensive legal counsel) for "talking like a lawyer", and then proceeding︆ to paste a "legal conclusion" from a chatbot.
 
With all due respect, what I consider important is to get back our assets and‌ what I highly appreciate is Mr. Schiff being here with us, working towards that goal.‍ I don´t know who started this group, but thank you! Without knowing it, I had⁠ found a group to join and with which I share a common goal. Best Wishes⁤ to all members.
 
I used chatGPT as an example to show how⁠ obvious the conclusion is. I have engage a top law firm to represnet me, so⁤ I am not getting my legal advice from ChatGPT.
 
I also by chance came upon this⁣ chat group. I think Peter should send emails to all 1702 customers to get involved⁢ in a chat like this.
 
I cannot agree more with you as yesterday we got only one new member, whose‌ name is Chat GPT.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu