I think that Admin summarized it well, but I'll go a little further. My personal background is as a compliance officer for a licensed trust and corporate services provider (I won't comment on the jurisdiction). During my audits, I reviewed a significant portion of company records and in many cases, records were in breach of regulations.
Just to name a few - simple issues from how a director was appointed, share transfers conducted incorrectly, incomplete records, etc. What was worse was that when I raised points with the customers was that they had no idea that matters were not handled correctly or indeed what were︀ the consequence of these actions. In many cases, clients trusted their CSP to provide guidance︁ and these matters were overlooked. In the majority of these instances, the director/ shareholder/ company︂ secretary would be held responsible and monetary fines can be imposed directly on the company︃ and not on the CSP in some of the examples that I mentioned. In many︄ instances, the beneficial owner was the director or shareholder.
It could have been avoided had︅ they used a CSP that was more knowledgeable and provided more support. These CSPs tend︆ to charge more for their services because they ensure that each customer transaction is compliant.︇ Clients normally have no idea that they are doing wrong and believe me - ignorance︈ is no excuse for breaking the law!