The future of book publishing business

JohnnyDoe

Schrödinger‘s guy
Dec 29, 2008
8,457
11,578
7,730
beach
johnnydoe.com
The publishing business is mutating into something most indie authors won’t survive. Forget the genius at his keyboard. The future is industrialized storytelling, powered by AI and operated like a cash-flow factory by big corporations.

The old playbook​

The traditional model was simple:
  • Employ an army of low-cost ghostwriters, recruited on Upwork or in some Manila ghetto
  • Pump out endless series in formula genres
  • Feed readers their dopamine drip
  • Hide behind one (or a dozen of) pen name(s)
That worked when speed and consistency were limited by cheap human labor. Now AI has blown the lid off.

The AI revolution​


AI takes the old model and weaponizes it:
  • Factories, not authors: fleets of pen names, each producing serialized fiction faster than New York publishers can even order lunch.
  • Algorithmic perfection: no messy drafts: AI trims, edits, and keeps continuity tighter than a human team.
  • Data-driven plots: reader drop-off points get tracked, weak chapters rewritten mid-series, stories evolve like living organisms.
  • IP farms: the real value is in the universe. Characters and series become franchises across media, merch, and spin-offs, like Marvel, but infinite. Marketed like junk food, consumed as such.

What happens to real writers?​

They don’t disappear, but they get ghettoized:
  • Human crafted literature becomes niche, like vinyl records: prestigious, slow, expensive, crackling.
  • Most readers won’t wait 18 months for a sequel when AI can deliver ten in the same week.
The future of books isn’t Hemingway versus Fitzgerald.
It’s Netflix versus TikTok.
And, consequently, the general population's IQ will continue to fall.

How AI can be used profitably by small businesses​

AI isn’t just good for churning out cheap vampire romances and crime thrillers. Its real killer application is in areas where humans never wanted to write in the first place. Think:
  • Technical manuals: dry, repetitive, jargon-heavy. Perfect for an AI that doesn’t get bored or sloppy on page 237.
  • Reference guides: anything where consistency matters more than “voice.” Product specs, compliance docs, user guides. AI can standardize tone, format, and indexing without human error.
  • Localization: translating manuals, FAQs, or even novels into twenty languages overnight, keeping the same style and structure.
  • Living documents: manuals and handbooks that update themselves as software or hardware changes, instead of rotting on a shelf.

Why Amazon sucks (as usual)​

Amazon saw what was happening. They realized that with AI one person can spawn dozens (or hundreds) of pen names and flood Kindle Unlimited like an unstoppable hydra. Their solution? Clamp down: one account, one author name, stricter checks on output.

This breaks the high-volume model for self publishers. Amazon is trying to funnel everything into a “one human, one brand” cage. It’s their way of slowing down the AI flood while protecting the appearance of a human centered marketplace.
You can try to trick Amazon with different companies, nominees etc, but their DD seems to be stricter than banks'.

And here’s the contradiction: readers don’t care if the book is written by “Jane Smith” or by an AI. They care if it delivers. As usual, the monkeys at Amazon don't understand what its clientele wants.

The future is clear:
  • Operators will push for scale, pen names, and automation.
  • Platforms like Amazon will push back, limiting accounts, slowing growth, and pretending books are still artisanal.
  • Readers will gravitate to whoever feeds them fastest. If Amazon throttles supply, someone else will step in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marty McFly and CEO
Amazon is the worst company ever, unethical and completely out of control, leaking money from everywhere and predated by the Chinese.
Being a (illegal) monopoly, who cares?
IMG_9143.png
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CEO

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu