Initially, it's crucial to clarify that my goal isn't anonymity, but rather privacy.
Furthermore, I have no intention of engaging in unlawful acts: no avoiding taxes, no criminal endeavors.
Considering this, is it practical to use a Nevis Holding IBC as a shareholder and/or director for companies incorporated in more reputable jurisdictions?
Or might this complicate things, such as opening bank accounts (not for the holding but for the other companies in the structure)?
According to ChatGPT this may be troublesome.
Last edited: Mar 27, 2024
Furthermore, I have no intention of engaging in unlawful acts: no avoiding taxes, no criminal endeavors.
Considering this, is it practical to use a Nevis Holding IBC as a shareholder and/or director for companies incorporated in more reputable jurisdictions?
Or might this complicate things, such as opening bank accounts (not for the holding but for the other companies in the structure)?
According to ChatGPT this may be troublesome.
- Banking Challenges: Banks have become increasingly cautious about their customers due to international regulations designed to combat money laundering and terrorist financing (e.g., FATF recommendations, AML/CFT requirements). When a company's shareholders or directors are entities in jurisdictions perceived as offshore tax havens, like Nevis, it can raise red flags with banks, leading to enhanced due diligence requirements.
- Due Diligence and Compliance: When opening bank accounts, especially in reputable jurisdictions like Singapore, Cyprus, or Hong Kong, you will be subject to strict due diligence processes. If your company's structure involves an IBC in Nevis, be prepared for additional scrutiny, and you may need to provide more extensive documentation about the beneficial owners, the nature of your business, and the reasons for using such a structure.
Is there any other way to reach a bit of privacy from the Public for sole ownership entities?
Last edited: Mar 27, 2024