People who recycle other people’s garbage articles always give off the same smell. Intellectual decay mixed with desperation.
OffshoreCorpTalk just did it again, grabbing an ICIJ piece like a raccoon dragging leftovers out of a bin and presenting it as if he had discovered journalism. The author did not even bother to understand the context or check whether the claims applied to the offshore world he pretends to analyze. He just slapped a link, added some hysterical commentary, and called it insight.
Here is the pearl:
The Rise of Global Crypto-to-Cash Desks: How Unregulated OTC Networks Became a Money Laundering Powerhouse
(copy paste the link to another window, if you are banned use incognito mode)
As usual, zero research. Zero original thought. Zero field experience.
Forums like that exist to repeat whatever the latest mainstream outlet publishes, hoping their users will fall for it.
The ICIJ article itself is old news. It reports on retail crypto cash desks in Europe and Israel that moved small bills for small criminals. Nothing global. Nothing high level. Nothing that explains how real cross border finance works. Yet OffshoreCorpTalk elevates it to a revelation. In reality it's just copy paste fear mongering with a sprinkle of GPT.
Recycling mass media content covers the fact that the author has never run a real company, never opened a bank in a difficult jurisdiction, never passed a compliance audit, never structured a transaction above five figures.
Now that he is desperate for content, he uses whatever article he can find and scream about it like a prophet of doom. It is a reliable indicator of incompetence.
If you cannot produce original analysis, you should at least understand what you are plagiarizing. OffshoreCorpTalk cannot. They regurgitate reports they do not grasp and distort them to keep the readers scared and dependent. It is tired. It is transparent. And it is the opposite of expertise.
Anyone who still falls for that deserves the quality of information they get.
Ironically, while they scream against Crypto OTC desks they publish such ads:
OffshoreCorpTalk just did it again, grabbing an ICIJ piece like a raccoon dragging leftovers out of a bin and presenting it as if he had discovered journalism. The author did not even bother to understand the context or check whether the claims applied to the offshore world he pretends to analyze. He just slapped a link, added some hysterical commentary, and called it insight.
Here is the pearl:
The Rise of Global Crypto-to-Cash Desks: How Unregulated OTC Networks Became a Money Laundering Powerhouse
(copy paste the link to another window, if you are banned use incognito mode)
As usual, zero research. Zero original thought. Zero field experience.
Forums like that exist to repeat whatever the latest mainstream outlet publishes, hoping their users will fall for it.
The ICIJ article itself is old news. It reports on retail crypto cash desks in Europe and Israel that moved small bills for small criminals. Nothing global. Nothing high level. Nothing that explains how real cross border finance works. Yet OffshoreCorpTalk elevates it to a revelation. In reality it's just copy paste fear mongering with a sprinkle of GPT.
Recycling mass media content covers the fact that the author has never run a real company, never opened a bank in a difficult jurisdiction, never passed a compliance audit, never structured a transaction above five figures.
Now that he is desperate for content, he uses whatever article he can find and scream about it like a prophet of doom. It is a reliable indicator of incompetence.
If you cannot produce original analysis, you should at least understand what you are plagiarizing. OffshoreCorpTalk cannot. They regurgitate reports they do not grasp and distort them to keep the readers scared and dependent. It is tired. It is transparent. And it is the opposite of expertise.
Anyone who still falls for that deserves the quality of information they get.
Ironically, while they scream against Crypto OTC desks they publish such ads:
