Is selling courses and educational materials a relevant activity in scope of ES requirements in BVI.
Courses, educational materials BVI.
- Thread starter JohnDoe1122
- Start date
- Status
So creating a course and then selling it doesn’t qualify as an IP business?
5.30 (b)capital gains and other income from the sale of an intellectual property asset;
Sorry if what I am asking is stupid. Just can’t understand it.
5.30 (b)capital gains and other income from the sale of an intellectual property asset;
Sorry if what I am asking is stupid. Just can’t understand it.
It is actually not a stupid question.
Hummm...technically a training course can be protected by copyright and what you are selling is use of that potentially copyrighted material. So you are right and it can be considered IP. I would get a second opinion however as I am no expert in that line of business.
Hummm...technically a training course can be protected by copyright and what you are selling is use of that potentially copyrighted material. So you are right and it can be considered IP. I would get a second opinion however as I am no expert in that line of business.
An entity manufactures and markets a trademarked product to unrelated third parties. The entity is not an intellectual property business because its income is derived from the sale of finished goods to third parties, not the exploitation of intellectual property assets. The use of︀ the trademark is an adjunct to the business.
Made it even more confusing.
Made it even more confusing.
As I just explained you in the other thread, the main goal of ES is to prevent Amazon, Google, etc. from registering patents and trademarks on their BVI company and then licence those IP back to their US and EU motherhouse at ridiculous prices to lower tax. All the ES rules pertain to profit shifting, i.e. setting up︀ a BVI conpany with the sole intent to have a lot of profit in the︁ BVI that used to belong to a company in a high-tax jurisdiction.
Hence, please read︂ the paper again with this in mind. It will be much easier to understand:
In other words, the IP rules are there because it is very easy︅ to use IP to shift profits (also note the direct reference to "profit shifting").
Also here, imagine you have Amazon doing research in the US but︊ then either selling the patents to the BVI company or directly applying for a patent︋ in the BVI for research which was done in the US. And then licensing the︌ IP back to the US.
I hope you now get the reason why those rules︍ have been put in place and why they are being monitored. For your situation, I︎ would not worry too much about ES. But you would need a director (a real️ one on paper) in an offshore jurisdiction. I do not think that you can do this reasobaly priced and believeable in BVI.
Hence, please read︂ the paper again with this in mind. It will be much easier to understand:
In other words, the IP rules are there because it is very easy︅ to use IP to shift profits (also note the direct reference to "profit shifting").
Also here, imagine you have Amazon doing research in the US but︊ then either selling the patents to the BVI company or directly applying for a patent︋ in the BVI for research which was done in the US. And then licensing the︌ IP back to the US.
I hope you now get the reason why those rules︍ have been put in place and why they are being monitored. For your situation, I︎ would not worry too much about ES. But you would need a director (a real️ one on paper) in an offshore jurisdiction. I do not think that you can do this reasobaly priced and believeable in BVI.
Sadly without ES the BVI will share data with the UBO's home country as I mentioned below. If OP doesn't mind that then continue exploring this path otherwise forget about going down this path and look for another solution.
https://www.offshorecorptalk.com/th...es-with-no-substance-with-ubos-country.36103/
https://www.offshorecorptalk.com/th...es-with-no-substance-with-ubos-country.36103/
What do we count as without substance. I just have to say to my agent if my company have engaged in relevant activities correct? I will still have a local director and a registered address there. My country doesn’t have history of hunting down such structures
Any recommendations where that would be reasonably priced?
Any recommendations where that would be reasonably priced?
Your best to confirm with your CSP or tax advisor. Oh and you need to ensure you consult one outside the EU. DAC6 requires EU et al providers to report the setting up of any structure that achieve a tax advantage.
https://www.offshorecorptalk.com/th...eporting-comes-into-effect-1-july-2020.29711/
There is no hunting needing to be done as the information is automatically shared each year by BVI.
https://www.offshorecorptalk.com/th...eporting-comes-into-effect-1-july-2020.29711/
There is no hunting needing to be done as the information is automatically shared each year by BVI.
They exchange the information if I say that I have done a relevant activity and I do not pass substance tests correct? If I do not engage in relevant activities they do not report?
Yeah, the ES reporting really put a dent in the effectiveness of BVI structures (and the required annual financial reporting from this year also).
Additionally, the UBO reporting was the final nail in the coffin for me.
In the end I just found it easy to wrap up my BVI entities (cost me a bloody fortune) and do everything out of HK (which is not perfect, but easy enough to pay very little CIT).
Additionally, the UBO reporting was the final nail in the coffin for me.
In the end I just found it easy to wrap up my BVI entities (cost me a bloody fortune) and do everything out of HK (which is not perfect, but easy enough to pay very little CIT).
Let me ask did I get everything correctly until this point. ES reporting - just report that company didn’t engage in relevant activity. If company didn’t︀ engage in relevant activity no UBO reporting. Annual financial return seemed really simple to fill.︁
- Status