Bangladesh Offshore Banking Units

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is all brand new in Bangladesh. They have passed law (Offshore Banking Act 2024)‌ and regulations to attract foreign capital. On paper, it looks quite attractive but it remains‍ to be seen whether it's actually any good. So far, it seems City Bank, Eastern⁠ Bank, Prime Bank, and several more have opened up OBUs.

Banking in Bangladesh has improved⁤ a lot of the last few years. This new law could be a great benefit⁣ to Bangladesh, but it's not without risks. These banks are quite inexperienced with international banking⁢ of this type. Hopefully they don't turn accidentally turn into money laundering nests. It would︀ be very unfortunate to have a bunch of EUR or USD flowing through an account︁ in Bangladesh only to one day see the bank being kicked out by its correspondent︂ bank after a sanctioned person or illegal activities are spotted.

Be careful. Take it slow.︃ Monitor the situation. But it could be an interesting new possibility for international banking.
 
Really, quite interesting. BTW, Bangladesh is non-AEOI/CRS country (not even talking to OECD re:this).

If you look at their webpages,‌ you'll see that the answer is yes 😉

@andorra, you are quite new at forum,‍ so just a friendly notice: I've seen that you are repeatedly writing here using only⁠ lowercase letters. Although this is definitely more acceptable than using uppercase only, it is not⁤ welcome. Please note that the readability of such a text is remarkably lower.
 
Is there a way to search and find a list of them?‍
 
AFAIK, the central bank hasn't issued a list of OBUs yet. You just‌ have to go through each bank individually and check. Not all banks have set up‍ their OBUs the same way.

The focus is on term deposits as Bangladesh wants to⁠ use this as a way to attract foreign currency reserves. I'm not sure how comfortable⁤ I feel depositing foreign currency in Bangladesh so that the government and banks there share⁣ up their reserves. We'll see if transactional banking is an acceptable use. Some banks say⁢ that as long as you keep 5-10,000 EUR/USD in cash, you can use the excess︀ transactionally.

Time will tell.
 
I applied yesterday to one of‌ them, they claim no fees for SWIFT transfers. Only correspondent fees.
 
Looks like everyone can open it, and they don't require many documents.

TBH, it looks a‌ little too good to be true, >7% on USD deposits for a year, no tax,‍ (so far not much different than what I have), but NO FEES AT ALL? (even⁠ no fee for SWIFT transfer!?!)

Anyway, I think I'll do a stopover in Dhaka next⁤ time, and test it out.
I still have some 'Takas' from the last time, which⁣ I haven't managed to exchange anywhere outside of Bangladesh ;-)

https://www.citybankplc.com/obu
 
You're only paying correspondent fees. As I mentioned, this is about driving up the amount of⁠ foreign currency in Bangladesh.

You can open the account remotely⁣ with most (if not all) OBUs.
 
I agree, this have to‍ be the motivation.
Certainly. Nevertheless, for this case I'd also prefer to inspect⁤ the situation on site 🙂 (Seriously, I think that walking around and in and exploring the⁣ local environment a little, including some discussions with the business people can really say a⁢ lot, in such a case.)
 
Is intersting to know how you can use the account only for deposit or also‌ for regular operation
 
Some banks give you a savings account and a current account.

On the savings account,‌ they want you to put at least 5–10,000 USD/EUR, ideally more. The more you have‍ in savings, the more it seems they allow you to transact on your current account.⁠
 
They also open corporate accounts quite easily with minimum documentation required, maybe this is a‌ good option for non-CRS banking that can be used in companies of jurisdictions with not‍ very good reputation.
 
Bangladesh will sign up for CRS, especially⁠ if they're taking a steps to invite more international banking. The only reason they haven't⁤ yet is because it's been a low priority (due to very little international banking). If⁣ this works, pressure will increase on Bangladesh to become CRS compliant.

Don't expect Bangladesh to⁢ be some long-term secretive banking haven.
 
I agree fully, yet I guess that it will not happen very⁣ fast, to deploy CRS.
a) They are completely omitted by OECD/FATF until now – they⁢ are not even mentioned in the last group (DEVELOPING COUNTRIES NOT ASKED TO COMMIT AND︀ THAT HAVE NOT YET SET A DATE FOR THE FIRST YEAR OF EXCHANGES) of the︁ infamous 😉 list AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION (AEOI): STATUS OF COMMITMENTS (I'm looking at its version︂ from 23 Apr 2024, probably the last one). But this can change very quickly, for︃ sure.
b) (As you are definitely well aware) deploying CRS brings technical requirements to the︄ banking system of the country which are not much simple. Taking into account the usual︅ general rigidity of banking systems (I admit I have no clue how it looks in︆ Bangladesh), my private estimation of (purely technical) possibility of the CRS launch is something like︇ 3 years since the political decision...
Your opinion?
 
If Bangladesh is threatened with a FATF gray listing, you can be︀ sure they will rush to comply. Bangladesh has a currency no one wants and an︁ economy that's hugely reliant on export of physical goods in rather competitive sectors. Any threats︂ to its access to USD, EUR, GBP, AUD, SGD, and other major international currencies is︃ an existential threat.

CRS is︈ actually pretty easy to deploy. The government just builds or buys a platform that's hooked︉ up the framework. To get a bare minimum CRS procedure deployed requires rather trivial technical︊ changes by the banks: make sure you collect TIN (which it seems they already do),︋ make sure you can get all the right data, and then submit it in the︌ CRS portal. Once the basics are in place, you work on improving it.

My opinion is you're right. It will happen, but it︎ will be probably be slow. How slow will to an extent depend on how well️ they manage any influx of international banking. The only way it happens within the next‌ 1–2 years is if FATF or OECD apply pressure, or Bangladesh decides to preempt such‍ pressure and just steamrolls ahead.
 
Agreeing at 100%.

Well, yes.︃ I understand your perspective.
Honestly, I am probably remarkably influenced by some (shared) experience of︄ people from major banks (or from companies that develop sw for them externally) how difficult︅ and time consuming is to introduce even a minor change to the system and/or processes.︆
But possibly, banks in Bangladesh might not be so developed 😉 🙁

Just generally – from my︇ point of view, the crucial parameter for this case (“use or not-to-use”) is the reliability︈ and quality of services provided by banks, which nobody can predict well at this moment,︉ I am afraid. The political stability/instability in Bangladesh also counts a lot.

Definitely, anyone's future︊ experience with OBUs will be more than appreciated 🙂
 
You're absolutely right that banks are extremely slow moving. (That's in many ways a⁤ good thing as it tends to make banks' technologies stable.) But CRS doesn't have to⁣ be a whole new thing the bank has to deploy. It can be an external⁢ system that the bank just needs to extract data in a certain format to achieve.︀ From what I've seen so far in Bangladesh, they already collect all the data necessary︁ to comply with CRS.

So while it might take a bank 3–4 years to develop/deploy︂ a minor change, CRS can be rolled out much faster. The delays in CRS are︃ usually legislative rather than technical. Local data protection and privacy laws may need to be︄ updated, for example.

I don't know what you expect. This︆ law is just a couple of months old. It's not like it's been around for︇ years and lots of people have different experiences.

The answer to your question is probably︈ no. No one has any experience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu