Search results

This will be my last message for the foreseeable future: Noone says Qenta is a scam as the company exists and is seemingly operating. But let´s face it: Numerous key players have confirmed that the delay now is because of Qenta and funds at Qenta are NOT segregated. Why would they be? It is...

Hi Radko ”“ I invite you to contact the receiver/Qenta. We are a large group, and we have had certain confirmations. The 4.15% ownership (Schiff in Qenta) is a fact that has been confirmed from several sources - even Schiff himself: “My continued tie to the bank that resulted from my 4.15%...

There are Radko, unfortunately. It is Qenta blocking the liquidation now and even the receiver has indicated (indirectly) this to fellow customers ”“ and it is the only logical explanation when you think about it. Don't believe me? I suggest you call directly the sources on their cell phones...

The USD 20mll Qenta had & the 47 mll USD the receiver had = probably roughly the final allocation claim - even though the split is roughly equal beween opt-in/out in terms of number of actual clients : A) all "non-responders" automatically became opt-ins and many here would have neglible...

FACT 1: Deposit base USD 66.7mll on the day of the C&D Order (30th June 2022) FACT 2: Total customers: 3,595 of which 1,702 “opt-in (47%) - & 1,893 customers “opt-out” (53%) - https://epbprliquidation.com/wp-content/uploads/09-15-2023_EPIB_Trustee_Case_Progress_Report.pdf: FACT 3: Latest...

EasyBank (Austrian bank: https://www.easybank.at/easybank): Is entering Puerto Rico in 2025 as an “Entidad financiera internacional” (EFI, or International Financial entity) ”“ just like Euro Pacific Bank was ! See local recent PR news...

unfortunately not just "fear mongering" Radko. From reliable sources it is known that 1) the delay since October is because of Qenta and 2) Qenta is in financial trouble. Some of the clients know people at Qenta, some of the clients have a lawyer and some of the clients have spoken to the...

Makes absolutely no sense: "Qenta also has some of the Opt out funds, which it needs to transfer back to the bank"

So lets recap: 1: Qenta has all opt-in client´s money in their account, as they bought those assets. Opt-in clients may have to face a new separation liquidation process if Qenta goes into liquidation/default themselves, as the assets have been transferred & the opt-in customers in writing...

very SHADY!! with Qenta who now has opt-ins money!! Blockchain Coinvestors Acquisition in an 8-K said it has terminated a merger agreement with crypto fintech Qenta, announced in November last year at an enterprise value of approximately $622 million. A forward purchase agreement connected to...

Scroll down here: https://nodusbank.com/#25eab3e1-9f2f-4a2e-a238-9736084cfffe and you will see an updated balance sheet (as of Nov 2024) for Nodus Bank, also in liquidation in PR. It lists 19 OFAC restricted funds OFAC is Office of Foreign Assets Control and a financial intelligence and...

Of course not. It is like saying that an appointed liquidator for HiPhi (a Chinese company in bankruptcy) must have experience working with Chinese luxury Electrical Vehicles ! (https://www.batterytechonline.com/a...y-ev-companies-that-have-filed-for-bankruptcy) And of course, when a government...

if an authority puts a bank into liquidation (a forced one in epb case) the liquidators job is to liquidate the bank meaning distribute the remaining assets and close it. That's it . It is NOT the liquidators job (his fiduciary duty) to assess whether the bank could be rescued by selling It to...

Peter´s main argument against the receiver for not “fulfilling his fiduciary duty” in this liquidation is that 1) the receiver hasn't been critically enough towards OCIF and 2) he has been slow with the liquidation. A man like Mr. Wigberto Lugo Mender with decades of experience going to court...

Regarding Peter Schiff comments: 1) he was obviously wrong when he stated above that he was suing the receiver in his “personal and professional capacity”. Martin , who also read the published lawsuit asked Peter why he made this inaccuracy on purpose but never got an answer from Peter 2...

Good evening Peter! Will you post the lawsuit now that all parties this week have been served? I see that as of Wednesday the 27th you have the CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (=a document in which a party certifies to the Court that any document filed with the Court has been mailed or otherwise served...

Conclusion: Peter Schiff´s lawsuit (that I hope he wins, and he is a guy I repect) made the receiver totally STALL....nothing after 11th of october "liquidation plan will be published in a few weeks" ...NOW we are at best with 1-3 years extra time, and as he is being sued together with "the...

Today: exactly 1 month since "all efforts are geared to commence this liquidation process within the next upcoming weeks" https://epbprliquidation.com/october-11-2024/ truly embarrassing

Hi Peter - good luck with your lawsuit. You have said many times in this forum that because of a NDA (or whatever you called it, some signature from your part), you were not allowed to sue OCIF. But suddenly now you could sue them? what changed?