Search results

Suing the receiver would deplete our own accounts. Unlike us they are free to use our reserves. Also we don't really have any proof that the receiver had done anything wrong. Suing the J5 could possibly lead to legislation that could prevent tax agencies from operating as a criminal cartel.

Why is this hard to understand? Someone somewhere made the decision to kill this and several other banks in Puerto Rico (and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines). Why do you think it was called Operation Atlantis? What do you think happened to Atlantis? The end result was clear from the get go.

@Pschiff based on the amount of money not under the control of the receiver can you guess which bank is witholding our funds ( Legal Documents | EPB Bank )?

Assuming that they are able to keep liquidating at the same pace of 5 mill per quarter the process could finish as early as the first half of next year. I guess it is progress that they are no longer pretending that they have all the money under control like they did this time last year.

Well the J5 does consist of third world islands. Except Australia for it is a continent. The rest do fit the description.

Not everyone knows the meaning of != or the meaning of ! in general.

When I have trouble following how many banks were put under water for the same reasons I have trouble believing that anything would have changed if this or that was different. Would said conspiracy theories be related to the international mass media campaign initiated by the J5 agencies? Pretty...

High risk and after 4 years of investigation we still don't know if there was a single client who was actually no good. By the way did anyone ask EPB to not have referral agents for example? Would that have helped? Probably not so it is probably irrelevant and always was. So they closed a legit...

If it is so insignificant why kill it? How many of the banks in "top" finanncial centers are going to fail because of unrealised losses? How much was it last year? Half a trillion? EPB would not have failed, because it had a close to 100% reserve ratio. And it was protected from inflation...

No, I agree that it is normal for the government to know what medicine I buy or what party I support in a totalitarian dictatorship. I never cared about the privacy part. I just needed a bank that didn't require physical presence and EPB did not make any loans and offered to hold my cash in...

Just because OCIF didn't care about the customers doesn't mean that the J5 did not wish to punish and make an example of the people who choose to bank outside of their jurisdiction.

That would pretty much be a win in my book. I would support a class action lawsuit if I haven't had lost all my money two years ago. We could just give back any damages awarded to Puerto Rico - legal costs. I doubt that anyone actually cares or hopes for more than getting back what is...

This is progress: IRS sued by economist after his bank was shut down I would rather see the guilty be punished then get any of my money back after all the lives they have destroyed.

If I had the money I would sue OCIF and the IRS. Even foreigners should have some protection such as: * due process * no unreasonable search and seizure * equal protection under the law These three protections have been denied for all of us. I mean just look at Silicon Valley bank. There's...

The receiver does not respond to questions, can't uphold basic promises such as more frequent updates and have made pointless requests to us even though their plan has not been accepted and blames OCIF even though they know that OCIF can't accept anything until all the assets are in the...

I bet you didn't even have 2FA activated just like Trump :D On a completely different note I am still working with the HMRC with the FOIA. They rejected it based on that I was asking for "personal" information which if true would exclude the IRS as a source. We will see... I'm 99% certain it...

EPB also got closed down before the war started. By the way Peter I've sent you an email. Please read it if at all possible.

Hi thanks for the info. Well I can't PM you so here is my telegram name I just created: trinimac87 .

My conspiracy theory is that without the receivership the HMRC would not have been able to obtain the client list of EPB legally, so it was necessary. I've sent a FOIA to the HRMC so we will hopefully see who gave them the data.

It says it in the text.