after multiple videos got removed by either Youtube or the video author I've started saving all interesting videos locally with https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp and recommend you to do the same
That I get better (and overall cheaper) ones without taxes.
Ok, then how about train, road and airports?
Since when they are free?
because they are worse than they could be and regulated health care costs people their lifes (distinguish between coercive regulation and voluntary standardization)
the keywords you want to search for are anarchocapitalism and austrian economics - a person of average intelligence can usually get this after 10-20 hours of study IN CASE it's open to changing its world view
There are indeed many of them, and that is why the social democratic governments gain so much ground and win many elections. Understandably, if one does not have great success in life or is simply disabled and unable to achieve a financially prosperous life.JohnnyDoe said:
Unless you are a parasite, in which case you are using the state for sucking blood out of other people.
Click to expand...
I think the problem with infrastructure is not the payment itself. It is the underlying legal system which eventually enables investment in infrastructure. Take a look at any state with moderate to high corruption. There simply is no one willing to invest in roads and airports.void said:
the keywords you want to search for are anarchocapitalism and austrian economics - a person of average intelligence can usually get this after 10-20 hours of study IN CASE it's open to changing its world view
Click to expand...
clearly, nobody wants to drive or fly... again, if you really want things to make sense you have to let bulls**t and dysfunctional patterns go and study a bitdaniels27 said:
I think the problem with infrastructure is not the payment itself. It is the underlying legal system which eventually enables investment in infrastructure. Take a look at any state with moderate to high corruption. There simply is no one willing to invest in roads and airports.
Click to expand...
What point are you making?daniels27 said:
I think the problem with infrastructure is not the payment itself. It is the underlying legal system which eventually enables investment in infrastructure. Take a look at any state with moderate to high corruption. There simply is no one willing to invest in roads and airports.
Click to expand...
Yes, that's in principle what I mean. But what is the use of property rights if there is no law enforcement? They are basically worthless. You not only need the rights but also the courts and the police to enforce them.W Fish said:
If by "the underlying legal system" you mean property rights, then you're spot on - property rights and freedom of speech are the underlying system that makes trade possible.
If trade is possible, then iphones come very quickly....
No government needed. 😉
Click to expand...
@void with all due respect, could we please keep the conversation on a level that is OCT-worthy? We are all grown ups, most of us are here to learn from each other and also please remember that replying is facultativ. You do not have to come here to insult. Of course there must be good reason why most roads are built with public resources and not privately.void said:
clearly, nobody wants to drive or fly... again, if you really want things to make sense you have to let bulls**t and dysfunctional patterns go and study a bit
Click to expand...
Wrong wrong wrong! It's sad to see people so deeply brainwashed.daniels27 said:
But what is the use of property rights if there is no law enforcement? They are basically worthless. You not only need the rights but also the courts and the police to enforce them.
Click to expand...
The court system exists to enforce the laws created by the state as it better suits the state itself from time to time through interpretation. Justice doesn't equal to law.daniels27 said:
You not only need the rights but also the courts and the police to enforce them.
Click to expand...
Law enforcement does not equal government.daniels27 said:
Yes, that's in principle what I mean. But what is the use of property rights if there is no law enforcement? They are basically worthless. You not only need the rights but also the courts and the police to enforce them.
Click to expand...
Wrong again. No monopoly exists without help from government. You are welcome to bring an example if you do not agree. 😉daniels27 said:
And the other problem I have with your suggestion is that any such system it is much more likely that key infrastructure ends up in monopolies.
Click to expand...