Hope no one is using Ghost.
- Thread starter wellington
- Start date
- Status
does not conform with the 2nd and 3rd requirements:
Skype was also replaced by Teams, which I wouldn't even recommend for regular communication. It feels like Microsoft is playing a joke on us at this point.
Check this site out, offers a feature comparison of many encrypted messaging apps, ranging from civilian apps such as snapchat, facebook, and discord, all the way to Signal, SimpleX, Briar, etc.
https://www.messenger-matrix.de/messenger-matrix-en.html
Maybe you also used NetMeeting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_NetMeeting
Microsoft never had any product that was technically good. It is like Aldi. They have cheap stuff that has wide acceptance. And most of the time it is quite poor implementation.
When asking about which communication and collaboration platform to use, a use case and threat model are defining factors.
We should not advise any particular end user profile - especially the ones with criminal behavior - to use any communication platform that may facilitate their illicit business fin4774" Seriously, there are bad guys reading these forums and I really pay attention what and how I write anything - no need for aiding and abetting indictment.
Of the humor, ToX and Briar are beside being decentralized solutions - hence, there may be (are) performance penalties - simply another jar with honey. Also, TOR may be implied with those solutions, so I would keep any content above private from them.
XMPP is a stable protocol. As an overlay, can utilize encrypted content - OTR, OMEMO, openPGP & S/MIME and other closed cryptographic solutions. By architecture is centralized - which is decent - but can be federated - which is optimal and clustered - which is perfect.
Rocket.chat is a not mature and is an quasi-integrated derivative.
Never use something that is created just for the purpose of defeating the surveillance.
Matrix 🙄 is a British blue pill 😎 Do not use it 🙄
Sometimes, a properly implemented TLS - as a transit encryption - offers more confidentiality then any content encryption designed by youngsters can 😉
We tested plethora of competitors' applications, including Simplex. They all failed, even SecuSmart and Silent Circle products and some from
https://www.ia.nato.int/niapc/Category/Mobile-Communications_51
I already wrote about Simplex in
[IMG alt="mraleph"]http://localhost/data/avatars/s/36/36604.jpg?1727588617[/IMG]
Well, this thread is interesting and nothing we discussed is by even the most relaxed definiton off-topic.
Majority of secure communication applications for any platform is either not secure because of the design errors or is intentionaly honeypot. Sometimes they have secondary benefit, beside being COMINT...
and generally about secure communication in
[IMG alt="mraleph"]http://localhost/data/avatars/s/36/36604.jpg?1727588617[/IMG]
This may be off-topic.
I respect your opinion despite that you have a wrong one. Time will prove that to you. And, I wish you without detrimental consequences.
Auditing and standards' certification doesn't mean anything 🙄 It's as accounting - can be quite creative fin4774"
I will always share publicly what I can - as I believe in certain transparency posture. But, I will not publicly comment specifics nor go against competition.
Without secure environment, no application and cryptographic system can protect the content.
Last edited: Oct 4, 2024
We should not advise any particular end user profile - especially the ones with criminal behavior - to use any communication platform that may facilitate their illicit business fin4774" Seriously, there are bad guys reading these forums and I really pay attention what and how I write anything - no need for aiding and abetting indictment.
Of the humor, ToX and Briar are beside being decentralized solutions - hence, there may be (are) performance penalties - simply another jar with honey. Also, TOR may be implied with those solutions, so I would keep any content above private from them.
XMPP is a stable protocol. As an overlay, can utilize encrypted content - OTR, OMEMO, openPGP & S/MIME and other closed cryptographic solutions. By architecture is centralized - which is decent - but can be federated - which is optimal and clustered - which is perfect.
Rocket.chat is a not mature and is an quasi-integrated derivative.
Never use something that is created just for the purpose of defeating the surveillance.
Matrix 🙄 is a British blue pill 😎 Do not use it 🙄
Sometimes, a properly implemented TLS - as a transit encryption - offers more confidentiality then any content encryption designed by youngsters can 😉
We tested plethora of competitors' applications, including Simplex. They all failed, even SecuSmart and Silent Circle products and some from
https://www.ia.nato.int/niapc/Category/Mobile-Communications_51
I already wrote about Simplex in
[IMG alt="mraleph"]http://localhost/data/avatars/s/36/36604.jpg?1727588617[/IMG]
Post in thread 'Pavel Durov Arrested France'
Aug 29, 2024Well, this thread is interesting and nothing we discussed is by even the most relaxed definiton off-topic.
Majority of secure communication applications for any platform is either not secure because of the design errors or is intentionaly honeypot. Sometimes they have secondary benefit, beside being COMINT...
and generally about secure communication in
[IMG alt="mraleph"]http://localhost/data/avatars/s/36/36604.jpg?1727588617[/IMG]
Post in thread 'Pavel Durov Arrested France'
Aug 30, 2024This may be off-topic.
I respect your opinion despite that you have a wrong one. Time will prove that to you. And, I wish you without detrimental consequences.
Auditing and standards' certification doesn't mean anything 🙄 It's as accounting - can be quite creative fin4774"
I will always share publicly what I can - as I believe in certain transparency posture. But, I will not publicly comment specifics nor go against competition.
Without secure environment, no application and cryptographic system can protect the content.
Last edited: Oct 4, 2024
100% this! Totally agree!
Also, 100% this! When the bad guys sing, some will even compose.
I'm not sure, considering the amount of gray matter on both sides 🙄 Don't you know what sarcasm is 😎 On a serious note, LE interpret even the naive text for the purpose of prosecution as a proof per se.
The context of this forum is relevant. There are roamers at OCT provoking non-appropriate content. Even the joke can lead to legal consequences.
Last edited: Oct 5, 2024
- No!
- They go to the dark web for the necessary information as they can ask without moderation.
- They are NOT trying to do REAL business legally like us. They are NOT trying to provide value to the system. They are into scams and fraud.
- CIs are here (but not so many) "if" they could get compensation, but that is a BIG "if"
Skype became a shitshow the moment Microsoft took over. They changed some of the drivers which led to a shitty sound quality.
Around those days they lost a ton of users. In niche industries (telecom) its still the to go to solution.
- Status