wellington said:
They are absolutely clueless in not the only one - my entire circle addressed their onshore costs.
Everything insurance related paid overseas to an overseas provider (believe it or not this is one of the biggest costs when you have a family).
Everything onshore was addressed on how it could be reduced or negotiated opposed to just paying previously - no prior haggling.
In addition even grocery shopping (central etc) we've found a way to reduce there onshore exposure with the same shopping without going the route some people suggested of using a overseas card (that's for the mentor group though).
Then onshore things like schooling we've gone with their parent companies and placements opposed to domestic placements as most of these schools etc are owned by a overseas company and have placements for kids - now that will change in the future as the kids will either study in Swiss/singapore or HK but for the time being this year at least we've adopted this approach.
I'd hazard a guess we've reduced our onshore exposure by 60% of costs and friends by 70%+ but most don't have kids.
We have staff (household etc) and those were normally paid by the wife after paying tax now they are paid via a service entity and have to pay their own tax.
Ultimately there will be a significant impact on the local economy for those that have structured planned so another idiotic idea by the Thai government failing to fulfill their ideas.
Click to expand...