Supporting the fight for freedom and privacy

[Don]

Supporting someone's fight for freedom and privacy through anonymous funding can be fraught with challenges and potential backlashes for the funder. While the intention may be noble, anonymity in legal proceedings can raise suspicions and even lead to legal repercussions for all parties involved. This complexity undermines the ability of individuals to confidently back such causes, creating barriers to much-needed support for those defending essential rights.

Here's an interesting case highlighting the above:
https://taxpolicy.org.uk/2024/03/08/secret_campaign/https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/kb/2024/530

 

[drphantom]

What a mess. What a shame on people freedom and privacy 😡 where will this go?‌

 

[void]

to cryptoanarchy and parallel societies

 

[Wellington]

Beauty of crypto transactions I suppose.

I generally donate heavily⁢ to the following causes

- victims
- poverty
- grassroots centralist politics
- slight right︀ of Centre politics

I would donate to political parties 6 figures but I’ve noticed that︁ can have rebound bites - I believe that’s actually the case in the UK hence︂ the conservatives have moved so far to the left because their backers these days are︃ extreme left or only interested in quid pro quo business access

But yes even donating︄ can have repercussions or make one the target with a scope.

That Roman chap the︅ DOJ indicted for that crypto privacy process (tornado?) had his go fund me page taken︆ down (believe I was forcefully refunded), and then there’s that guy that is uneducated but︇ centralist however portrayed as right wing - Tommy Robinson that was arrested in London whilst︈ eating breakfast -donated to that and noticed some unusual things about a month after

 

[jafo]

Yikes! There are much better, more efficient, and more anonymous ways to bring the fight‌ to the doorsteps of those who trespass on others.

"For my friends... everything!
For my‍ enemies...The (Criminal) Law."

dev56""" smi(&%
- Oscar R. Benavides, President of Peru from 1933 to 1939

PS. "Criminal" was added by me as it is the ONLY way to really "handcuff" the⁠ enemy!