Keystone crypto wallet

depends... how much you hold, what do you do with your coins, what is your risk profile and threat model, how technical/advanced user you are... I'm afraid there is no straight answer without more info
I use it just to hold some btc, forever or until I need to sell them for something I need.
I’m not facing any particular risk, AFAIK. I guess the same risk that everyone faces: confiscation by the authorities and robbery by thieves (which is the same as the former).
I can assemble a pc but I don’t do programming.
 
I use it just to hold some btc,
I didn't mean the exact number but let say portion of your assets (i.e. importance and potential impact of the loss on your wealth) 😉
forever or until I need to sell them for something I need.
I’m not facing any particular risk, AFAIK. I guess the same risk that everyone faces: confiscation by the authorities and robbery by thieves (which is the same as the former).
I can assemble a pc but I don’t do programming.
trezor one (and also model T) doesn't have a secure element which means that your seed stored in the device is vulnerable (it's not easy to extract but doable) - hence use of additional passphrase (the variable length 13th or 21st word) is a necessity

trezor one also doesn't support shamir backup (private key split to multiple share with configurable quorum) which is another considerable reason


trezor 7 might be an overkill but in my opinion far the best and most trustworthy hw wallet available these days
you can freely ignore the quantum-ready marketing which is mostly bullshit but the rest of the features makes it a great choice despite the rather high price

it's missing basically the only thing that some might require which is an air-gapped interface - for me it's mostly fetish that basically nobody needs, especially if the user knows what he is doing and where... not mentioning the challenges when it comes to hardware and software design implications
 
Last edited:
it's missing basically the only thing that some might require which is an air-gapped interface - for me it's mostly fetish that basically nobody needs, especially if the user knows what he is doing and where... not mentioning the challenges when it comes to hardware and software design implications
How can you use it for signing if the device is air gapped?
 
How can you use it for signing if the device is air gapped?
typical solution is integrated camera to scan QR codes to transfer chunks of data back and forth

alternatively NFC or sdcard can be used

clearly this has an impact on convenience, usability and technical solution (ergo price of the device)
 
typical solution is integrated camera to scan QR codes to transfer chunks of data back and forth
too cumbersome and doesn't sound safe: the screen or OS compromise can lie about contents.
alternatively NFC or sdcard can be used
a device with NFC is not airgapped
clearly this has an impact on convenience, usability and technical solution (ergo price of the device)
a small removable key, rewritten for every transaction, could be used to sign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnnyDoe

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu