How to create the strongest anonymous offshore company?
- Thread starter burden
- Start date
- Status
Back that time it was very easy, today it isn't any longer. Better setups are with mentioned methods in mentor group gold but not to miss out on the fact that you can appoint nominees for the entire process. I mean, you don't want setups like this for anything serious og very long term. Short business strategies 2 - 3 years and gone is the company.
Thank you very much for your offer, and it was a very interesting conversation we had last time. It was also exciting to read about your latest venture. However, as I mentioned earlier, I don’t have anything to sell at the moment. I’ll be sure to reach out if that changes.
I assume that with Nominees a proper Nominee Structure is Setup with a Nominee / Trust Agreement for the sole purpose of not being on any Company Registry no matter if the Country of Incorporation has a Public Company Registry or not.
If a Service Provider is using dedicated Nominees and only one Nominee per Setup at a time I don't see any issue why the entire Setup shouldn't run for years.
A Nominee︀ Setup doesn't automatically mean that someone can't be mentioned as UBO of a Bank this︁ needs to be discussed in detail and a Nominee Agreement Setup accordingly.
The Bank you︂ choose to Setup with should be experienced with Nominee Structures or in the case of︃ a full Nominee Setup including Nominee being the Shareholder of the Company and mentioned as︄ UBO in front of the Bank the Service Provider giving you the Nominee Setup on︅ hand should be Experienced and know what he is doing.
I doubt that in 2025︆ a Nominee Structure with a Random Nominee / Passport Copy is going anywhere far as︇ it's most of the time limited to EMI's and the AI of this EMI's is︈ getting more and more advanced so that if the Nominee itself is not limiting you︉ for sure a higher volume is limiting you at some point especially if you get︊ Questions or Additional Questions asked you should make sure the Nominee you are using is︋ at your disposal and not used for 10+ other Companies.
Hope this helps and is︌ saving some people reading this money.
If a Service Provider is using dedicated Nominees and only one Nominee per Setup at a time I don't see any issue why the entire Setup shouldn't run for years.
A Nominee︀ Setup doesn't automatically mean that someone can't be mentioned as UBO of a Bank this︁ needs to be discussed in detail and a Nominee Agreement Setup accordingly.
The Bank you︂ choose to Setup with should be experienced with Nominee Structures or in the case of︃ a full Nominee Setup including Nominee being the Shareholder of the Company and mentioned as︄ UBO in front of the Bank the Service Provider giving you the Nominee Setup on︅ hand should be Experienced and know what he is doing.
I doubt that in 2025︆ a Nominee Structure with a Random Nominee / Passport Copy is going anywhere far as︇ it's most of the time limited to EMI's and the AI of this EMI's is︈ getting more and more advanced so that if the Nominee itself is not limiting you︉ for sure a higher volume is limiting you at some point especially if you get︊ Questions or Additional Questions asked you should make sure the Nominee you are using is︋ at your disposal and not used for 10+ other Companies.
Hope this helps and is︌ saving some people reading this money.
There’s always some risk in using nominees, unless you’ve got 100% control over them, which most people don’t. It also depends on the size of the company, the more money involved, the bigger the risk. But for smaller setups with assets under 50 to 100K, I don’t see much of a problem as long as you’re working with a well-known agent.
There are many ways to appoint nominees, and, more importantly, to find nominees who actually align with your business needs. I fully agree that there's always a residual risk when using nominees, but if you limit the activity of︀ the company to simple trading and avoid storing significant assets in it, instead routing funds︁ to a more secure structure, then that risk is significantly reduced.
We have far too︂ little information about how people are actually using these companies: where and how they're set︃ up, what purposes they serve, and what kind of nominees are involved.
Each of these︄ points could easily branch out into ten more questions unless things are clearly defined and︅ made concrete.
We have far too︂ little information about how people are actually using these companies: where and how they're set︃ up, what purposes they serve, and what kind of nominees are involved.
Each of these︄ points could easily branch out into ten more questions unless things are clearly defined and︅ made concrete.
The company still exists, and no one really seems interested in it either.
Yes, banking is extremely difficult to make work for these kinds of setups, especially if you don’t want your name tied to anything.
And no, it’s not a long term solution if you’re relying on a bank account. In that case, you’re better off sticking to crypto.
Yes, banking is extremely difficult to make work for these kinds of setups, especially if you don’t want your name tied to anything.
And no, it’s not a long term solution if you’re relying on a bank account. In that case, you’re better off sticking to crypto.
You can’t truly trust anyone, not service providers, not users you meet here, or anywhere else. The only thing you can rely on is what you do yourself. Everyone else comes with a risk.
We’ve discussed this many times before. There are plenty of people who have been seriously burned by nominees. Likewise, there are nominees who’ve been scammed in return. And perhaps most importantly, many simply don’t know what they’re doing, and that’s exactly why they get scammed.
In the end, it doesn't︀ really matter whether we’re talking about nominees or life in general, the principle is the︁ same.
We’ve discussed this many times before. There are plenty of people who have been seriously burned by nominees. Likewise, there are nominees who’ve been scammed in return. And perhaps most importantly, many simply don’t know what they’re doing, and that’s exactly why they get scammed.
In the end, it doesn't︀ really matter whether we’re talking about nominees or life in general, the principle is the︁ same.
Well the popular trick was to get someone from a third world country some money︁ and use his passport as a nominee without him ever knowing what exists in his︂ name. That trick died off with CRS etc. I found out when I was reading︃ ICJ reports on that trick .
It does seem like things are getting more challenging when it comes to staying anonymous these days. An US LLC can provide some level of privacy, but you're right: once banking is involved, maintaining full anonymity becomes much more difficult.︀
For me, the key is ensuring that my personal information doesn't end up publicly available︁ on the internet, like it often does in most countries. It's even worse in places︂ like Georgia, where you can easily download copies of passports.
For me, the key is ensuring that my personal information doesn't end up publicly available︁ on the internet, like it often does in most countries. It's even worse in places︂ like Georgia, where you can easily download copies of passports.
- Status