Hope no one is using Ghost.
- Thread starter Wellington
- Start date
- Status
Skype was also replaced by Teams, which I wouldn't even recommend for regular communication. It feels like Microsoft is playing a joke on us at this point.
Check this site out, offers a feature comparison of many encrypted messaging apps, ranging from civilian apps such as snapchat, facebook, and discord, all the way to Signal, SimpleX, Briar, etc.
https://www.messenger-matrix.de/messenger-matrix-en.html
https://www.messenger-matrix.de/messenger-matrix-en.html
Maybe you also used NetMeeting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_NetMeeting
Microsoft never had any product that was technically good. It is like Aldi. They have cheap stuff that has wide acceptance. And most of the time it is quite poor implementation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_NetMeeting
Microsoft never had any product that was technically good. It is like Aldi. They have cheap stuff that has wide acceptance. And most of the time it is quite poor implementation.
When asking about which communication and collaboration platform to use, a use case and threat model are defining factors.
We should not advise any particular end user profile - especially the ones with criminal behavior - to use any communication platform that may facilitate their illicit business fin4774" Seriously, there are bad guys reading these forums and I really pay attention what and how I write anything - no need for aiding and abetting indictment.
Of the humor, ToX and Briar are beside being decentralized solutions - hence, there may be (are) performance penalties - simply another︀ jar with honey. Also, TOR may be implied with those solutions, so I would keep︁ any content above private from them.
XMPP is a stable protocol. As an overlay, can︂ utilize encrypted content - OTR, OMEMO, openPGP & S/MIME and other closed cryptographic solutions. By︃ architecture is centralized - which is decent - but can be federated - which is︄ optimal and clustered - which is perfect.
Rocket.chat is a not mature and is an︅ quasi-integrated derivative.
Never use something that is created just for the purpose of defeating the︆ surveillance.
Matrix 🙄 is a British blue pill 😎 Do not use it 🙄
Sometimes, a properly implemented︇ TLS - as a transit encryption - offers more confidentiality then any content encryption designed︈ by youngsters can 😉
We tested plethora of competitors'︋ applications, including Simplex. They all failed, even SecuSmart and Silent Circle products and some from︌
https://www.ia.nato.int/niapc/Category/Mobile-Communications_51
I already wrote about︎ Simplex in
and generally about secure communication in
I will︆ always share publicly what I can - as I believe in certain transparency posture. But,︇ I will not publicly comment specifics nor go against competition.
Without secure environment, no application︈ and cryptographic system can protect the content.
We should not advise any particular end user profile - especially the ones with criminal behavior - to use any communication platform that may facilitate their illicit business fin4774" Seriously, there are bad guys reading these forums and I really pay attention what and how I write anything - no need for aiding and abetting indictment.
Of the humor, ToX and Briar are beside being decentralized solutions - hence, there may be (are) performance penalties - simply another︀ jar with honey. Also, TOR may be implied with those solutions, so I would keep︁ any content above private from them.
XMPP is a stable protocol. As an overlay, can︂ utilize encrypted content - OTR, OMEMO, openPGP & S/MIME and other closed cryptographic solutions. By︃ architecture is centralized - which is decent - but can be federated - which is︄ optimal and clustered - which is perfect.
Rocket.chat is a not mature and is an︅ quasi-integrated derivative.
Never use something that is created just for the purpose of defeating the︆ surveillance.
Matrix 🙄 is a British blue pill 😎 Do not use it 🙄
Sometimes, a properly implemented︇ TLS - as a transit encryption - offers more confidentiality then any content encryption designed︈ by youngsters can 😉
We tested plethora of competitors'︋ applications, including Simplex. They all failed, even SecuSmart and Silent Circle products and some from︌
https://www.ia.nato.int/niapc/Category/Mobile-Communications_51
I already wrote about︎ Simplex in
and generally about secure communication in
I will︆ always share publicly what I can - as I believe in certain transparency posture. But,︇ I will not publicly comment specifics nor go against competition.
Without secure environment, no application︈ and cryptographic system can protect the content.
I'm not sure, considering the amount of gray matter on both sides 🙄 Don't you know what sarcasm is 😎 On a serious note, LE interpret even the naive text for the purpose of prosecution as a proof per se.
The context of this forum is relevant. There are roamers at OCT provoking non-appropriate content. Even the joke can lead to legal consequences.
The context of this forum is relevant. There are roamers at OCT provoking non-appropriate content. Even the joke can lead to legal consequences.
- No!
- They go to the dark web for the necessary information as they can ask without moderation.
- They are NOT trying to do REAL business legally like us. They are NOT trying to provide value to the system. They are into scams and fraud.
- CIs are here (but not so many) "if" they could get compensation, but that is a BIG "if"
- Status